Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sarah_27_m
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 4

    Using DeSeq2 with 16s data, valid parameters

    Hello,

    I am trying to use DeSeq2 in R to analyse differential abundance between 16s samples at OTU level. However I am not sure if the code I am using is valid for what I want to do. Codes comes from the phyloseq tutorial. http://joey711.github.io/phyloseq-ex...ns/DESeq2.html

    My data is 16s data (Illumima MiSeq), collected from birds with different caecal lesion scores (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) and uninfected controls, for each I have <10 biological replicates per group. What I am interested in doing in comparing abundance of OTUs across groups.

    I do as below to load my data into the matrix and then to ensure that I only have two groups (eg. 4 & uninfected) for comparison I remove the other groups using the subset option. Then run the code below.

    My question is, is subsetting like this still allowing the program to take all of the data, even that which isn't being compared, into account?

    Secondly am I struggling to know which parameters to use for this type of data with DeSeq2. Can I simply implement what is done for RnaSeq data here to look for differentially abundant OTUs or is this wrong completely? I am not sure which fitType to use; parametric or local or which test to use; Wald or LRT? Doing comparisons there is not much difference in the data, but would be good to know which is best to use.

    The reason I am using DeSeq2 is because I have a small data set, min of 8 biological replicates, max of 11 biological replicates per group.

    Having read the package manual I am still unclear. http://www.bioconductor.org/packages...man/DESeq2.pdf

    library("phyloseq")
    library("ggplot2")
    library("devtools")
    otufile=("table.from_biom_w_consensuslineage_0_replaced.txt")
    mapfile=("Mapping_file_LS.txt")
    trefile=("rep_set_tree.tre")
    qiimedata = import_qiime(otufile, mapfile, trefile)

    qiimedata = subset_samples(qiimedata, LesionScore != "0")
    qiimedata = subset_samples(qiimedata, LesionScore != "1")
    qiimedata = subset_samples(qiimedata, LesionScore != "2")
    qiimedata = subset_samples(qiimedata, LesionScore != "3")

    diagdds = phyloseq_to_deseq2(qiimedata, ~ LesionScore)
    diagdds = DESeq(diagdds, test="Wald", fitType="parametric")

    res = results(diagdds, cooksCutoff = FALSE)
    alpha = 0.05
    sigtab = res[which(res$padj < alpha), ]
    sigtab = cbind(as(sigtab, "data.frame"), as(tax_table(qiimedata)[rownames(sigtab), ], "matrix"))
    head(sigtab)
    sigtabOrdered <- sigtab[order(sigtab$padj),]
    plotMA(res)
    plotDispEsts(diagdds)


    Any help would be great
    Sarah
    Last edited by sarah_27_m; 01-06-2017, 06:54 AM.
  • sarah_27_m
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 4

    #2
    The answer to part of my question, this demonstrates that microbiome count data from amplicon sequencing experiments can be treated with the same procedures as for differential expression data from RNA-Seq experiments.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...