Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • s_farraj
    Junior Member
    • May 2012
    • 7

    #1

    Dropping in QC of FASTAQ

    Hi all,
    We have MiseqDX and we upgraded it to be compatible with 600cycles kit.
    We made after that 2 runs:
    The first one was for 16srRNA library following the recommended protocol from illumina (It doesn't depend on any library preparation kit). We used 600cycles kit.
    The second run is for whole genome sequencing for different species (viruses & bacteria). We used Nextera XT kit with 300cycle kit.
    In both runs when we check the QC for the fastaq files we found a systematic dropping in all samples. I mean by dropping, the quality score reduced to near 2 then returns back to 37 in all the samples in the run (the pictures attached for the QC for one of the samples in each run, the rest samples are the same).
    The dropping in the first run was in R1 from cycle 5 to cycle 20.
    In the second run, The dropping was in R2 from cycle 30 to 75 cycle.

    Did anyone face problem like this?
    Is there any explanation for this situation?

    Thanks
    Attached Files
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You must have a region of low nucleotide diversity in that region in the middle (e.g. A's in majority of clusters at that cycle) which leads to these drops in qualities. Can you post nucleotide distribution plot from FastQC?

    What version chemistry is this? What is cluster density and PF%? Was phiX spiked in and at what concentration?
    Last edited by GenoMax; 01-24-2017, 10:47 AM.

    Comment

    • s_farraj
      Junior Member
      • May 2012
      • 7

      #3
      Thanks for your quick response.
      I attached the Fasta QC report for the sample for the second run and pic for its data.
      This run didn't have Phix.
      But like I said in the previous post, this was for whole genome sequences for different species.
      This one was V2 but the first run was with V3.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • thermophile
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2015
        • 243

        #4
        check your thumbnails. I'd guess that your density is actually much higher than 1300-genomes should have very high PF
        Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

        Comment

        • s_farraj
          Junior Member
          • May 2012
          • 7

          #5
          Thanks for your answer
          Today the engineering come and check these runs and he said its over clustered
          I think I will reduce the conc. of pooling library from 10pM to 6pM hoping avoid this dropping issue.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...