Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rafaykhan
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2016
    • 3

    MaSuRCA Assembler runCA Error

    Successfuly install MaSuRCA

    HTML Code:
    tar xfz MaSuRCA-3.2.1.tar.gz
    HTML Code:
    cd MaSuRCA-3.2.1
    HTML Code:
    sudo ./install.sh
    Configure and run config.txt

    Code:
    MaSuRCA-3.2.1/bin/masurca MaSuRCA-3.2.1/bin/config.txt
    Verifying PATHS...
    jellyfish OK
    Error: runCA not found or failed to run
    Help me to get through this error.
  • sklages
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 628

    #2
    Please do not crosspost to Biostars if you want help here ..

    jellyfish is in your PATH, runCA is not.

    You could either use --path /PATH/TO/runCA with masurca or add the corresponding path to your PATH variable.

    There is a bin folder in masurca installation directory which holds the common binaries. runCA and other programs are in one of the "neighbor" folders, in CA/bin or CA8/bin.

    best,
    Sven

    Comment

    • rafaykhan
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2016
      • 3

      #3
      Thank you Sven, its work

      PATH=~/tools/MaSuRCA-3.2.1_12062016/CA/Linux-i686/bin:$PATH
      PATH=$PATH:~/tools/MaSuRCA-3.2.1_12062016/CA/Linux-i686/bin

      sudo env "PATH=$PATH" ~/tools/MaSuRCA-3.2.1_12062016/bin/masurca ~/tools/MaSuRCA-3.2.1_12062016/bin/config.txt

      Comment

      • drunk_coder
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2011
        • 9

        #4
        I also have a runCA issue, I installed MaSuRCA-3.2.1_01202017 successfully. I use CA8/bin in my PATH. During Assembly, MsSuRCA threw a runCA error:
        "ERROR: the runCA option ovlHashBlockSize is not recognized.
        This runCA functionality changed in CABOG version 7.
        Try using ovlHashBlockLength instead."

        I found masurca generated "assemble.sh" based on runCA6 command, but installed runCA version is 8.2. So how to fix this issue ?

        best,
        mjx

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...