Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SDPA_Pet
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 222

    #16
    Originally posted by Markiyan View Post
    Clustering means bridge amplification for pre ExAmp (non-patterned flowcells) - in situ PCR on the flow cell surface oligos lawn. Has similar rukes/laws to a regular PCR, only the product stays in situ, forming a forest from DNA strands.

    For ExAmp Chemistry (patterned flowcells) - Clustering means cluster formation using Isothermal Amplification.
    (In theory only on the occupied nanowell, in practice, especially at low loading concentrations a few neighbours may join in too...).

    Have a read about ExAmp & Hiseq4000:
    http://core-genomics.blogspot.co.uk/...d-to-know.html
    Thank you. I did my sequencing on old platform HiSeq 2500.

    Comment

    • fanli
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 197

      #17
      Out of curiosity, why are you joining the read pairs? A lot of the metagenomics software out there now supports paired end reads as input. The metaSPAdes assembler @GenoMax mentioned requires paired end data IIRC.

      Comment

      • SDPA_Pet
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2013
        • 222

        #18
        Originally posted by fanli View Post
        Out of curiosity, why are you joining the read pairs? A lot of the metagenomics software out there now supports paired end reads as input. The metaSPAdes assembler @GenoMax mentioned requires paired end data IIRC.
        Hey, I did try metaSPAdes, less than 1% of total reads assembled. A lot of people tried alternative methods, joined paired-ends and get long reads, but don't assembled reads. Then, use the long merged reads to do BLAST or other annotations.

        Comment

        • fanli
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2014
          • 197

          #19
          Would something like kraken or CLARK not be helpful? Are you trying to assemble and annotate de novo genomes? Or trying to figure out the microbial composition and functional content? I guess my point is you would discard ~40% of your data in the joining process, which may not be necessary depending on your task of interest.

          Comment

          • SDPA_Pet
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2013
            • 222

            #20
            Originally posted by fanli View Post
            Would something like kraken or CLARK not be helpful? Are you trying to assemble and annotate de novo genomes? Or trying to figure out the microbial composition and functional content? I guess my point is you would discard ~40% of your data in the joining process, which may not be necessary depending on your task of interest.
            I am not interested in a specific genome in the soil community. Basically, I am just interested in the microbial composition and functional content. There is another way that people usually do. They don't assemble or merge pairs and they just blast using raw data. However, I think blast using ~150bp reads is worse. Some publication shows the intermediate length (merged pair) is better than assembled longer reads or unasembled short reads for the question that I am asking for.

            Comment

            • fanli
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2014
              • 197

              #21
              You might find this benchmark to be helpful:


              My understanding is that you are better off using newer k-mer based approaches as opposed to BLAST. I've had reasonable success with kraken, although the memory requirements are somewhat onerous. You also have to be extremely careful about removing contaminant (aka human) sequences as these tend to get misclassified.

              Another option is kallisto (https://github.com/pachterlab/metakallisto) but I have yet to be able to even build a database due to memory constraints.

              Comment

              • SDPA_Pet
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2013
                • 222

                #22
                Originally posted by fanli View Post
                You might find this benchmark to be helpful:


                My understanding is that you are better off using newer k-mer based approaches as opposed to BLAST. I've had reasonable success with kraken, although the memory requirements are somewhat onerous. You also have to be extremely careful about removing contaminant (aka human) sequences as these tend to get misclassified.

                Another option is kallisto (https://github.com/pachterlab/metakallisto) but I have yet to be able to even build a database due to memory constraints.
                I will try. Can you gimme the Kraken link? Thanks.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                  ...
                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
                  by SEQadmin2


                  With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


                  Introduction

                  Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
                  05-22-2026, 06:42 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Environmental Genomics in the Age of NGS: From Microbes to Conservation Strategies
                  by SEQadmin2

                  Studying ecosystems means dealing with complex, multi-species communities that are hard to observe at scale. This complexity, however, hides many important questions to be answered, from how biogeochemical cycles work and how climate change can affect species distribution to how conservation strategies can work best.


                  Genomics, particularly since the expansion of NGS, has transformed ecosystem ecology. By sequencing environmental DNA, we can now assess biodiversity without direct...
                  05-06-2026, 09:04 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
                0 responses
                21 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
                0 responses
                14 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 05-28-2026, 11:40 AM
                0 responses
                29 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 05-26-2026, 10:12 AM
                0 responses
                31 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...