Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lmbrutscher
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2016
    • 1

    Metagenomic Assembly from PacBio reads

    Hi everyone,

    I am trying to assemble a bacterial genome using PacBio reads and short illumina reads from a metagenomic pool of both eurkaryotic host and bacterial sequences.

    In an ideal world, I would have been able to culture the bacteria and obtain pure DNA to sequence and assemble from, but its cultivation has proved challenging. So, instead we have a ton of metagenomic data sequenced obtained from whole host DNA. We have roughly ~70 million Illumina MiSeq paired end reads (2x150) and ~120,000 PacBio reads (5-20 KB). I suspect that I have roughly 3x coverage of the bacterial genome with the PacBio reads and ~20-30x coverage with the illumina reads (with 80-90% of the reads likely being host). This project is further complicated by the fact that the host genome is not fully sequenced, so I cannot remove known host sequence to simplify analysis and de novo assembly.

    Could anyone recommend an appropriate set of programs/pipeline in order to isolate and assemble the bacterial genome? Thanks so much!
    Last edited by lmbrutscher; 04-03-2017, 12:21 PM.
  • rhall
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 324

    #2
    Hi,
    There isn't one well developed approach to an experiment like this, I can think of a lot of things to try, but it is going to come down to a lot of manual assembly work.
    My first observation would be that the pacbio coverage is a little low if you want to go for a hybrid assembly approach. With only 3x of data a lot of the genome will not be covered at all and the chances of the reads within that 3x spanning the important repeats, that will not be resolved in the illumina data, is slim.
    I would concentrate on the illumina data, assemble with a standard metagenomic assembly algorithm, for a recent comparison http://journals.plos.org/plosone/art...l.pone.0169662. Then bin the microbial contigs by comparing with a database, using something like Kraken.
    3x of pacbio data is going to be all but useless, but you could try manually aligning the pacbio data to the binned microbial contigs to see if you can get any useful scaffold information. The problem at 3x is that even if you do see a single read join two illumina contigs it is impossible to tell if that is a real connection or not. There is always a none zero chance of a biological chimera being formed during sample prep, a random event, so normally you would always require at least two reads to corroborate a connection.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      Yesterday, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    9 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    52 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    110 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...