Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • R_Beth
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2017
    • 1

    Linear Combinations in DESeq2 design

    Hello,

    I have an RNAseq experiment where I am studying longterm effects from a pregnancy condition in mice. Although there are expression similarities between littermates (observed on my bioplot and sample-to-sample dendrograms), long-term metabolic responses within a litter vary. I would like to know what genes are changes with the pregnancy condition but regress out the changes due to different litters. Because the group is a pregnancy condition, “MNR” and controls cannot be in the same litter, resulting in two of my variables being a linear combination.

    The summarized experiment is the following:
    ID Group Litter_alph
    C1 Control b
    C3 Control c
    C7 Control c
    C6 Control d
    C4 Control d
    C8 Control d
    C5 Control e
    C2 Control e
    I9 MNR a
    I5 MNR f
    F2 MNR f
    T6 MNR g
    F3 MNR g
    T3 MNR h
    T7 MNR i
    T5 MNR i
    I1 MNR i
    T4 MNR j
    T2 MNR k
    I6 MNR k
    F4 MNR l
    I2 MNR l
    I3 MNR l
    I4 MNR l
    I7 MNR m
    T1 MNR n
    F1 MNR n
    T8 MNR n
    I8 MNR o

    Here is an example of that command:
    > design(ddsMF) <- formula(~ Litter_alph + Group)

    Error in checkFullRank(modelMatrix) :
    the model matrix is not full rank, so the model cannot be fit as specified.
    One or more variables or interaction terms in the design formula are linear
    combinations of the others and must be removed.

    I’ve tried to work around this by (see http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47881)

    > m <- model.matrix(~ID:Litter_alph + Group, se)
    > m_use <- m[ , colSums(m) > 0]
    > design(dds) <- ~ Group
    > dds <- estimateSizeFactors(dds)
    > dds <- estimateDispersionsGeneEst(dds, modelMatrix=m_use)

    Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : inv(): matrix seems singular

    Is there anyways to work around these issue and regress out litter effects? Any help would be appreciated!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...