Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #16
    Originally posted by gringer View Post
    1.5% index hopping with no adapters spiked in. Does that mean anything?
    I think 1.5% hopping is from the libraries in the pool and not the spiked-in adapters.

    Comment

    • austinso
      Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 77

      #17
      Makes me wonder if single molecule consensus is out of the question, since it would seem that the mitigation strategy requires defined barcode sequences.

      Comment

      • DNATECH
        Member
        • Mar 2015
        • 31

        #18
        It shows that PCR-free libraries can hide a larger amount of adapters and adapter dimers somehow entangled in the y-adapters. We have several times seen surprises with (on the BA) clean looking PCR-free libraries in this regard.

        Originally posted by gringer View Post
        1.5% index hopping with no adapters spiked in. Does that mean anything?

        Comment

        • nucacidhunter
          Jafar Jabbari
          • Jan 2013
          • 1250

          #19
          Originally posted by ECO View Post
          Anyone doing significant multiplexing should be using dual indicies, which reduces this problem dramatically (making swapped reads go to Undetermined while demultiplexing).

          Interested to see if this is a problem in our novaseq runs...will update if I note something.
          I wonder if there is any update on this.

          Comment

          • kmcarr
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 1181

            #20
            Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
            I wonder if there is any update on this.
            In our core we did the following test: Project with 64 RNA-Seq libraries prepared using Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA HT Dual Index kit on a Perkin Elmer Sciclone G3 robot. We also add a second AMPureXP cleanup at the end of the prep. We divided these into 8 pools of 8 libraries each following the dual index pooling guidelines in Illumina's white paper about index hoping so that each pool had 8 dual-unique index pairs. Each pool was loaded on one lane of HiSeq 4K flow cell and sequenced SE50 (51 cycles R1, 8 cycles I1, 8 cycles I2) using standard protocol.

            Total output per lane was ~370-380M reads. With 8 i7 and 8 i5 indexes in each lane there are a total of 64 combinations possible, 8 expected combinations and 56 which may result from index hoping. I ran bcl2fastq (2.19.0) looking for all index pairs, permitting 1 mismatch per barcode.

            For any given unexpected index pair produced through index hoping I found an average of ~35,000 (± 9,850) reads or approximately 0.01% of the total lane output.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            10 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...