Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cindylanzao
    Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 19

    #1

    Remove SNP in segment duplication and repeat region

    Hi,All

    I am trying to detect somatic mutations in healthy people, I have searched some reference, however, both of the two detection method contains remove those variants in segment duplication and repeat region. Can anyone explain why should remove those SNP located in these two regions? Thanks!
  • wdecoster
    Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 97

    #2
    In short, because those variants have (due to technical difficulties) a high chance of being false-positive.

    Comment

    • cindylanzao
      Member
      • Nov 2012
      • 19

      #3
      Originally posted by wdecoster View Post
      In short, because those variants have (due to technical difficulties) a high chance of being false-positive.
      Thanks, could you explain a little bit of why variants in these region could be false-positive?

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        In a duplicated/repeat region, there is no way to know whether the read is mapped to the correct location; and thus, it's impossible to determine whether the variant call is in the correct place. Also, repeats are hard to assemble so the reference is less likely to be correct there. Typically you can just discard ambiguously-mapped reads rather than discarding variants, though.

        There's a large block of Chr Y that is similar to Chr X; as an exception, variants in this region are often called on the X chromosome, since if they were discarded, much of the X/Y chromosome would be unusuable for variant detection.

        Comment

        • cindylanzao
          Member
          • Nov 2012
          • 19

          #5
          Originally posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
          In a duplicated/repeat region, there is no way to know whether the read is mapped to the correct location; and thus, it's impossible to determine whether the variant call is in the correct place. Also, repeats are hard to assemble so the reference is less likely to be correct there. Typically you can just discard ambiguously-mapped reads rather than discarding variants, though.

          There's a large block of Chr Y that is similar to Chr X; as an exception, variants in this region are often called on the X chromosome, since if they were discarded, much of the X/Y chromosome would be unusuable for variant detection.
          Thanks Very Much

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 12:22 PM
          0 responses
          12 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          48 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...