Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dross11
    Member
    • Mar 2015
    • 14

    #1

    Acceptable Passing Filter (%PF)

    I am running some bisulfite converted amplicon-seq libraries (Fluidigm Access Array) on a MiSeq with version2 300-cycle reagents without PhiX (I will be spiking in 5% PhiX in future runs). As this is a low diversity pool and it has been bisulfite treated, I have been expecting lower than normal quality scores, however, I am seeing a rather low %PF. I have run two pools so far which have the following run metrics:

    cluster density %PF AVG%Q30
    Run1 935K/mm2 75.93% 88.84%
    Run2 695K/mm2 65.4% 85.36%

    I am not sure whether I should be concerned about the low %PF or whether it is expected for bisulfite converted amplicon libraries. Is there anything I can do to help increase the %PF? Can I still continue with analysing the resulting FASTQs from these runs or is that a bad idea?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.


    Edit:
    I checked the optic images and they not overclustered.

    The first 22 bp of my insert is the Fluidigm sequencing primer and because the %PF is determined after the first 25 cycles the machine might 'think' all the libraries/clusters are homogenous fooling it into determining the run as being overclustered and giving a low %PF. Does this reasoning seem like an explanation?

    Edit2:
    Yield of the first run was 5.28Gbp and 4.07Gbp and Illumina advertise the maximum v2 yield as 5.1Gb, suggesting most clusters are in actuality passing filter.
    Last edited by dross11; 05-11-2017, 09:00 AM. Reason: reinstated last edit
  • thermophile
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 243

    #2
    spiking in phiX should increase your pf% but those numbers aren't horrible given you didn't spike in. For my amplicon runs, I spike in 15% phiX and usually see ~80-90% pf

    No reason not to use this data, what's passed filter and been demultiplexed should be fine
    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

    Comment

    • WhatsOEver
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 215

      #3
      Do you need the fluidigm seq primer for anything in the downstream processing? If not, I would suggest to run 10-20 dark cycles (depends if the primer seq is really at the start of every fragment) in the sequencing protocol. If you have a normal seq complexity after the primer, you will not run into any problems in terms of cluster identification.

      Comment

      • dross11
        Member
        • Mar 2015
        • 14

        #4
        I performed a run today. I spiked in 5% PhiX and the %PF is at 73.49% and quality is at ~94% with a cluster density of ~1100K/mm2. I'll try 15% next time but I am fairly certain the lowish %PF is due to the sequencing primers presence within my insert. I will also look into performing 15 dark cycles next time round too (this is really very clever).

        Thank you for your help and reassurance
        Last edited by dross11; 05-12-2017, 08:26 AM. Reason: More info

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
        0 responses
        38 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        51 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...