Does anyone have any experience using either Ampure or the Qiaquick qiagen columns to clean up small amounts of DNA? I'm only starting with 100ng of DNA and want to lose as little as possible along the way. Which one gives the best DNA recovery? Many thanks in advance.
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
-
I recently make a library (Illumina protocol) from 100ng of ChIPed DNA and I used Qiagen columns and measured the recovery after each step using Qubit. After step 1 (end repair) I recovered almost 100%, after step 2 (A-base addition) about 70%, and after step 3 (adapter ligation) about 75%. However, I use 37 degree buffer EB and elute twice. (so basically I started with 100ng and ended up with a bit over 50ng going into the size selection step).
I've tried Ampure and the recovery was good but took a lot longer. A neighboring lab recently tested Ampure, Ampure XP, and Qiagen and the Ampure XP was the best in their hands. We'll switch to Ampure XP when we run out of the minelute columns.
Comment
-
-
1. It is recommended to use freshly prepared 80% EtOH.
2. 15 min incubation to bind DNA with multiple vortexing steps during this time period...~10sec per vortex should be fine...just mix things up.
3. It is okay to pipet the beads with the EtOH to mix them (I call this "triterating"), but I usually mix them using the magnet...back and forth. BUT, you can also just add the EtOH and do no mixing at all.
4. As it is recommended to elute 90uL of beads with no less than 30uL, I have sucessfully eluted 160uL of beads with 17uL, with minimal losses...just give it a little extra time.
5. I always spin down my tubes after any mixing/vortexing prior to placing tubes back on the magnet or leaving for further incubation...just a quick spin to get stuff off the tube walls...not compacting the beads.
6. There are better "cleaners/concentrators" than Qiagen...maybe the Zymo...as far as losses go. AMpure XP seems to be the best for yields, but does take much longer. For Qiagen-type column units I tend to bind the DNA twice, and elute twice...same PB/EB, just put it back into the column and spin again. Also, let the EB sit for at least 1min on the filter before spinning.
Comment
-
-
Just to add clarification, usually the loss is associated with the "dead volume" (i.e. the liquid between beads) and sometimes the wetting of the plastic surface. So the more beads you use, the greater the dead volume and the poorer your recovery.Originally posted by niceday View PostECO is that 2-3 minutes on a vortex?
I recently eluted some samples after ampure cleanup. Out of curiosity I re-eluted the beads for 3 hours and got 15% DNA back. I'll be speaking to some people to find out if this is the norm.
In my experience it also depends on how "flattened" the magnetized pellet is, which is why sometimes I use really strong rare-earth magnets for the post wash elution rather than anything on a stand.
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...-
Channel: Articles
06-02-2026, 10:05 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.
Introduction
Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...-
Channel: Articles
05-22-2026, 06:42 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:09 AM
|
0 responses
9 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 10:09 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
|
0 responses
17 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
|
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
|
Comment