Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #16
    Originally posted by gringer View Post
    1.5% index hopping with no adapters spiked in. Does that mean anything?
    I think 1.5% hopping is from the libraries in the pool and not the spiked-in adapters.

    Comment

    • austinso
      Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 77

      #17
      Makes me wonder if single molecule consensus is out of the question, since it would seem that the mitigation strategy requires defined barcode sequences.

      Comment

      • DNATECH
        Member
        • Mar 2015
        • 31

        #18
        It shows that PCR-free libraries can hide a larger amount of adapters and adapter dimers somehow entangled in the y-adapters. We have several times seen surprises with (on the BA) clean looking PCR-free libraries in this regard.

        Originally posted by gringer View Post
        1.5% index hopping with no adapters spiked in. Does that mean anything?

        Comment

        • nucacidhunter
          Jafar Jabbari
          • Jan 2013
          • 1250

          #19
          Originally posted by ECO View Post
          Anyone doing significant multiplexing should be using dual indicies, which reduces this problem dramatically (making swapped reads go to Undetermined while demultiplexing).

          Interested to see if this is a problem in our novaseq runs...will update if I note something.
          I wonder if there is any update on this.

          Comment

          • kmcarr
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 1181

            #20
            Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
            I wonder if there is any update on this.
            In our core we did the following test: Project with 64 RNA-Seq libraries prepared using Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA HT Dual Index kit on a Perkin Elmer Sciclone G3 robot. We also add a second AMPureXP cleanup at the end of the prep. We divided these into 8 pools of 8 libraries each following the dual index pooling guidelines in Illumina's white paper about index hoping so that each pool had 8 dual-unique index pairs. Each pool was loaded on one lane of HiSeq 4K flow cell and sequenced SE50 (51 cycles R1, 8 cycles I1, 8 cycles I2) using standard protocol.

            Total output per lane was ~370-380M reads. With 8 i7 and 8 i5 indexes in each lane there are a total of 64 combinations possible, 8 expected combinations and 56 which may result from index hoping. I ran bcl2fastq (2.19.0) looking for all index pairs, permitting 1 mismatch per barcode.

            For any given unexpected index pair produced through index hoping I found an average of ~35,000 (± 9,850) reads or approximately 0.01% of the total lane output.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            39 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            45 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...