Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jlfmssm
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 14

    How to check read are properly paired from SAM file?

    I am new for NGS data.
    How to check reads are properly paired from SAM file?
    It is appreciated someone can point me some programs?

    Thanks,
    Aimin
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    Originally posted by jlfmssm View Post
    I am new for NGS data.
    How to check reads are properly paired from SAM file?
    It is appreciated someone can point me some programs?

    Thanks,
    Aimin
    Use 'samtools view -X <in.bam>'. All reads with a capital "P" in the flag field are properly paired.

    Comment

    • jlfmssm
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 14

      #3
      Thanks, I tried, but I got this error:

      [aimin@node01 all_sam_data]$ samtools view -X 1382_1.sam/1382_1.sam
      [bam_header_read] EOF marker is absent.
      [main_samview] fail to read the header.

      Comment

      • nilshomer
        Nils Homer
        • Nov 2008
        • 1283

        #4
        Originally posted by jlfmssm View Post
        Thanks, I tried, but I got this error:

        [aimin@node01 all_sam_data]$ samtools view -X 1382_1.sam/1382_1.sam
        [bam_header_read] EOF marker is absent.
        [main_samview] fail to read the header.
        Use the "-S" flag to specify that you are inputting a SAM file (not a BAM file). Please read the documentation, including the output when no options/input is specified.

        Comment

        • jlfmssm
          Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 14

          #5
          but I got this:
          [aimin@node01 all_sam_data]$ samtools view -S -X 1382_1.sam/1382_1.sam -o 1382_1_test.out
          [samopen] no @SQ lines in the header.
          [sam_read1] missing header? Abort!
          What I should do now?

          Comment

          • nilshomer
            Nils Homer
            • Nov 2008
            • 1283

            #6
            Originally posted by jlfmssm View Post
            but I got this:
            [aimin@node01 all_sam_data]$ samtools view -S -X 1382_1.sam/1382_1.sam -o 1382_1_test.out
            [samopen] no @SQ lines in the header.
            [sam_read1] missing header? Abort!
            What I should do now?
            The lines "no @SQ lines in the header" and "missing header?" should tell you to check the header in the SAM file. Is there one? If not, you have to feed in your reference with the "-T" option.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              Yesterday, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            10 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...