Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • taylor_wilcox
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2016
    • 3

    Short mixed amplicon libraries

    I'm interesting in sequencing libraries composed of multiplexed PCR products with amplicon lengths running from 50 - 150 bp. A colleague expressed concern about sequencing bias for shorter amplicons on the Illumina platforms (likely will want to use MiSeq).

    Does anyone have experience sequencing libraries of short, mixed-length amplicons/insert sizes? If so, can you comment on the level of sequencing bias? If sequencing bias was a problem, do have a good working solution (e.g., pooling amplicons of different lengths at different relative molarity)?
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    What kind of sequencing bias are you referring to? If you are going to be mixing products of different length then even the low nucleotide diversity (which may be an issue with amplicon sequencing) would not be a problem.

    Comment

    • taylor_wilcox
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2016
      • 3

      #3
      Sorry I didn't make that clear. I mean a bias towards smaller amplicons (~50 bp) relative to larger amplicons (~ 150 bp). For example, would I expect a large drop in coverage for the 150 bp amplicons relative to the 50 bp amplicons when pooled equimolarly on the same lane?

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        It is true that shorter inserts tend to cluster more efficiently on the flowcell than longer ones. You could use less amounts of shorter ones and try to bias a uniform representation.

        Someone with more practical bench experience may have more specific tips for you now we know what you are working with.

        Comment

        • thermophile
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2015
          • 243

          #5
          length bias still exists on illumina flowcells but it's not anywhere close to as strong as it was with 454. You may need to tweak your load ratios a small amount but not much. 5-10% as a complete guess
          Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

          Comment

          • fanli
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2014
            • 197

            #6
            I'm curious about this too - we've held back from running different amplicons together precisely because it'd be a complete shot in the dark as to how much to tweak loading concentrations.

            Here is some data from one of our V1V2 runs (as these will have some naturally occurring length variation). No clear relationship between amplicon size and number of reads output. Note that amplicon size refers to the average size of the largest peak and all libraries were pooled equimolar for sequencing. These are from the Tapestation, fwiw.
            Attached Files

            Comment

            • thermophile
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2015
              • 243

              #7
              My primary type is 16s v4 (~300bp). I've mixed up to 30% of a run with ITS2 (~250-400bp) or custom ~150bp amplicons with no issues and no noticeable decrease in reads for the longer amplicons on the run but I'm looking for a minimum per sample rather than average
              Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              55 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...