Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • drkijak
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2017
    • 2

    problem with samstat on PacBio alignment

    Dear all,
    I ran an alignment of Sequel data using blasr. Now I want to get some metrics about the sam file using samstat 1.5.1 (running on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS; 16 Gb of RAM).
    I get a message that reads:

    [2017-08-01 13:26:25] SAMstat 1.5.1, Copyright (C) 2014 Timo Lassmann <[email protected]>
    [2017-08-01 13:26:25] cmd: samstat Ecoli_2K.sam
    [2017-08-01 13:26:25] Ecoli_2K.sam
    --------------------------------------------------
    [2017-08-01 13:26:25] Starting to collect data.
    [2017-08-01 13:26:25] Training a HMM on mapq > 20 reads.
    Segmentation fault (core dumped)


    I suspect the problem is the file size (>150,000 reads, file size: 13.5 Gb), so I trimmed the sam file using "head -n". I am only successful at getting a report when I have 20 reads...

    {I have no problem getting a report when I work with Illumina-based alignments}

    Is this a PacBio-specific problem?
    Is the problem the memory? is there a way to increase the RAM usage of samstat (similar to a -vm function in some Java applications)?
    is there another solution? Are there other programs out there that can do the same as samstat 1.5 (the reports are very cool!)?

    Thanks,

    Gustavo

    PS: there is the same kind of problem if the alignment is done with BWA MEM...
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    What kind of statistics are you looking for? Perhaps Qualimap may work instead.

    Comment

    • drkijak
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2017
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks GenoMax! I wanted to get some qmap summary (the piechart at the top of the samstat report). I may need to script it with Rsamtools...

      I think that samstat and qualimap complement each other.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...