Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marnal
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2017
    • 3

    rRNA and adapter removal bondaries in RNA-seq HiSeq 3000 Illumina

    Hello

    I am new in RNA-seq analysis and it is difficult for me to find out info about quality assessment in the matter. I did an analysis with fastqc and MultiQC in a Paired End, 125nts (2x125), HiSeq3000 experiment. I obtained these two plots (attached) and I am not sure if a rRNA or adapter removal is required prior to alignment.

    In the case of the adapter content plot it looks like all samples have adapters included, in fact none of the samples passed the QA. In the case of the plot with %GC content (I read it can be used to detect a possible rRNA enrichment) I see a proportion of reads having a GC content higher than 60%, but I am not sure if it is enough to confirm a high presence of rRNA that could affect to posterior analysis.

    Any help will be useful!

    Thanks

    Magda
    Attached Files
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You should scan/trim your sequences with a suitable program (bbduk.sh from BBMap, trimmomatic, cutadapt etc.). While some rely on aligners to soft-clip adapter sequences (and they likely will), trimming them beforehand ensures that your initial data is clean.

    Presence of rRNA is a separate issue. If you feel that your data has rRNA reads in it then the best solution is to align a sample (or whole data) to rDNA repeat for your organism. While rRNA reads would not directly interfere with counts if you have uneven levels of them across samples then they can indirectly affect your results.

    Comment

    • marnal
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2017
      • 3

      #3
      Thanks for your quick answer, it was very useful! Just a last question, could you recommend me a tool or database I could use to make the alignment with the rDNA repeats of an organism?

      Thanks

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        What organism are you working with?

        Comment

        • marnal
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2017
          • 3

          #5
          We are working with human

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            You can get the human rDNA repeat from here. If you do see contamination you can use bbsplit.sh from BBMap suite to separate those reads from rest of your data, if you wish.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              Today, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            30 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            28 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...