Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • koiologist
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2017
    • 2

    Index Read not mapped

    Hello,

    We are recently experiencing demultiplexing issues on HiSeq 4000, NextSeq 500 and MiSeq, where we have good cluster formations, high read PFs, and greater than 90% >Q30 scores but only a very small fraction <1% of the sequenced indexes passed PF and were mapped. Majority of our read output (>60%) were in the undetermined fastq file but each sample in our pooled library do get a fastq file containing very little reads. We spiked in about 5% PhiX as it is a low diversity library (predetermined viral peptide sequences).

    We are using custom 7-nucleotide IS7 indexes which can be mapped (98%) if only one sample (one index) was ran. Library was gel and pcr purified and bioanalyzer showed a single sharp peak at the expected fragment size.

    Any thoughts?
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Over-clustered FC's may have good data for main reads but will fail on the index reads (do you have a large number of N's or are the sequences something you do not expect to get in the index).

    You should deliberately under load by 15-20% and/or increase the % of phiX to 10-20% and see if that helps.

    Comment

    • koiologist
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2017
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks for the reply. We had one run on the MiSeq where only a single indexed sample (input library) was sequenced. The run was very over clustered and with very low main read PFs (less than half of read output) but most of the indexes (98%) were mapped. I think in one of our NEXTSeq run we did see a bunch of N's in our index sequences. I do not know if the same things (the N's) are also seen in our MiSeq and HiSeq runs.

      Thanks.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...