Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sda89
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2018
    • 2

    DADA2 vs Deblur

    Hi all!!

    I'm a PhD student working on microbiome and mycobiome in skin dog!

    I'm learning how to analyse bacterial sequences from IonTorrent, using the QIIME2 program. I saw in the tutorial of QIIME2 that is possible to apply DADA2 or DEBLUR for the analysis.

    My question is: what do you think about DADA2 and DEBLUR? which one would be recommended to obtain good results?

    Thank in advance!!

    best regards

    Sara
  • thermophile
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 243

    #2
    Why IonTorrent? MiSeq is cheaper and much better sequence quality for amplicons? Besides dada2 and deblur are both for illumina sequencing, applying them to IonTorrent would require quite a bit of groundtruthing that I don't think has been done (I'm sure someone will jump in with references if I'm wrong on this).
    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

    Comment

    • Bukowski
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 388

      #3
      'Deblur has not been evaluated with Ion Torrent': https://forum.qiime2.org/t/deblur-p-...failure/1880/5

      DADA2 recommendations for Ion Torrent data: https://github.com/benjjneb/dada2/issues/67

      This may guide your choice.

      Comment

      • sda89
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2018
        • 2

        #4
        Dear Thermophile and Bukowski,

        Really thank for replying me! We only have IonTorrent for sequencing, so that's the reason why I was asking if it would be good to analyse sequences with DADA2 or Deblur.
        I know that both are for Illumina, but I saw in QIIME2 tutorial and on QIIME2 forum that they can be used for IonTorrent too. As I'm not an expert of DADA2 and Deblur, I asked an advice!!

        Thank you again!!


        Sara

        Comment

        • snetmcom
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2008
          • 159

          #5
          The other option is to use Ion Torrent's microbial pipeline. I have not used it, but I know a group that exclusively uses it for their metagenomic workflow.

          Comment

          • isalarubi
            Member
            • Feb 2013
            • 12

            #6
            Originally posted by snetmcom View Post
            The other option is to use Ion Torrent's microbial pipeline. I have not used it, but I know a group that exclusively uses it for their metagenomic workflow.
            Dear @sentmcom,
            could you put me in contact with the this group using the Ion torrent pipeline? I have tried to use it, but although the accuracy of the prediction is really good, it has a lot of limitations to work on it, and I am looking for somebody that uses it to interchange information.
            Thanks in advance
            Isabel

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              Yesterday, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            52 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            110 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...