Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • roussine
    Arctic Member
    • Nov 2017
    • 2

    Merging PE reads before de novo RNA-Seq assembly

    Hello!
    can someone please give an opinion: does that make sense to merge PE reads before a de novo RNA-seq assembly (say with Trinity)?
    Merging tools are quite fast (like USEARCH www.drive5.com/usearch/manual/merge_pair.html), and the amount of raw data is reduced drastically. Can merged data be suitable for further assembly in a “single-ends” mode, or am I missing some theory behind it?.. Seems like it may save a lot of computations.

    Thanks in advance.
    Leo
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    For reference cross-posted to: https://www.biostars.org/p/295213/

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      I've never understood why people think that pair-merging prior to de novo assembly is a good idea. Seems like were that the case, assembly engines would just do pair-merging themselves prior to other assembly steps.

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        Yesterday, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      8 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      29 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...