Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hoytpr
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 62

    Small RNA library with 200bp extra peak

    I just looked at our new small RNA library submitted by a respected lab on the Bioanalyzer. The small RNA library should be about 178, and it's there, but most of the samples have a broader but distinct peak at 200bp. I've posted a link to an example below. Any ideas what this could be and even more, how to eliminate it?

    Thanks.
    Pete
  • sbarberan
    Member
    • Feb 2017
    • 17

    #2
    That to me looks like over-amplification, we have seen 'bulged' products that run at 200-250bp. See page 9 of this protocol from the Mello lab (http://www.lsi.umich.edu/files/SmallRNACloning.pdf)

    What kit was used to prepare the libraries? 178 is big for miRNAs unless you are using QIAseq.

    Cheers,
    sergio

    Comment

    • hoytpr
      Member
      • Dec 2009
      • 62

      #3
      You're right, that does resemble over amplification. I was going to run the samples on a denaturing gel but that protocol says not to. Can it be fixed? I think the protocol was mostly custom. I'm not someone who makes small RNA libraries yet, so I can't really comment on what was custom and what may have come from a kit.
      Last edited by hoytpr; 02-12-2018, 04:51 PM.

      Comment

      • sbarberan
        Member
        • Feb 2017
        • 17

        #4
        Bulged products are not a problem for sequencing, you only see them with gels or bioanalyzer. For sequencing you denature the libraries anyways. So there is nothing to fix, just that they probably amplified the libraries for too many cycles.

        Comment

        • hoytpr
          Member
          • Dec 2009
          • 62

          #5
          Originally posted by sbarberan View Post
          Bulged products are not a problem for sequencing, you only see them with gels or bioanalyzer. For sequencing you denature the libraries anyways. So there is nothing to fix, just that they probably amplified the libraries for too many cycles.
          So, you'd have to quantify by QPCR then, as fluorescence or Bioanalyzers won't tell you the number of correctly formatted sequences with adapters?

          Comment

          • sbarberan
            Member
            • Feb 2017
            • 17

            #6
            You are probably right that qPCR will be the only way to quantify with 100% accuracy, but generally we do not use qPCR and even with libraries with bulged products we manage to quantify only with Qubit and Bioanalyzer and get great pooling.

            Alternatively you can also try to denature the sample before loading into the Bioanalyzer.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              Yesterday, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            52 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...