Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • meriem
    Member
    • May 2016
    • 19

    can I remove the N's in my sequence?

    Hello,

    I'm having a problem with mine assembly, I have a bacterial genome of 3.7bp assembled into 24 contigs, which was part of an under submission research, the reviewer gave me as a feedback that I should have a gap free sequence; Unfrontutly I can't not re-do the sequencing or use Pacbio. so I used ragout for reference-assisted assembly to improve the quality of my assembly; I got 1 scaffold of 3.7 bp, but a lot of ns (40000 n), how can I fix this problem? is this software reliable since I got some small fragment left? can I remove the ns without affecting the sequence?

    thank you
  • cstack
    Member
    • May 2017
    • 16

    #2
    Just so we are using the same terminology: An assembly gap is typically represented by a series of N's connecting two contigs; the product of 2+ contigs connected by gaps is referred to as a scaffold.

    Your 24 original contigs contained no gaps (Ns), correct? I would confirm this first

    I have never used Ragout, but it seems to order and connect contigs based on a reference genome; in the process of connecting contigs, gap characters (Ns) are added. There is nothing atypical about this -- Without looking over your manuscript, it is difficult to say why the review took issue with the gaps.

    Anyhow, you can use
    Code:
    seqtk cutN -n 1 ragout.fasta
    to break up the single, 3.7(M?)bp scaffold produced by ragout into a set of gap-free contigs.

    Comment

    • meriem
      Member
      • May 2016
      • 19

      #3
      Originally posted by cstack View Post
      Just so we are using the same terminology: An assembly gap is typically represented by a series of N's connecting two contigs; the product of 2+ contigs connected by gaps is referred to as a scaffold.

      Your 24 original contigs contained no gaps (Ns), correct? I would confirm this first

      I have never used Ragout, but it seems to order and connect contigs based on a reference genome; in the process of connecting contigs, gap characters (Ns) are added. There is nothing atypical about this -- Without looking over your manuscript, it is difficult to say why the review took issue with the gaps.

      Anyhow, you can use
      Code:
      seqtk cutN -n 1 ragout.fasta
      to break up the single, 3.7(M?)bp scaffold produced by ragout into a set of gap-free contigs.
      Thank you for your reply,
      My 24 contigs doesn't contain any N's.
      Im' doing a comparative genomic analysis of 2 strains from an extrem envirenement, I got this msg from the reviewer " In that the strains on which this Genome Report is based can be grown in culture, it is necessary to produce gap-free sequences for both strains, since the data would be more generally useful for the community at large. Given the high coverage that is already available, it would probably be necessary to take a more direct approach (rather than increasing coverage)."

      If I Use this commande I will go back to my initial contigs, No?

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      37 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...