Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pauline dlp
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2018
    • 8

    #1

    Methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes for GBS

    Hi all!

    I need help in selecting a restriction enzyme for GBS. Elshire's protocol for GBS calls for methylation-sensitive enzymes (They used ApeKI). He also underscores this in GBS workshops. I understand the use of methylation-sensitive REs is to filter out repetitive regions and to enrich genic regions, right?

    Now here is where I am confused. I went out to search for literature for GBS done on insects (as I will be studying silkworm genomics), and found that some GBS studies use non-methylation-sensitive REs.

    [1] Silva-Brandão et al in 2015, used PstI and MspI (double enzyme GBS) for oriental fruit moth. PstI and MspI are both NOT methylation sensitive.

    [2] Dupuis et al in 2017 used PstI and MspI for GBS of the North American spruce budworm.

    They both cited Poland 2012 for double digest GBS using PstI and MspI.


    So does this mean methylation-sensitive REs are not required for GBS after all? What would be the consequences of choosing a methylation-insensitive vs. methylation-sensitive enzyme for GBS?
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Methylation sensitive enzymes are more useful for plants as their genome contains large repetitive regions due to duplication events. PstI is methylation sensitive in plants as in plants methylation normally is in non-CpG context.

    Choosing methylation insensitive RE can result in sequencing non-informative tags from repeat regions increasing the cost and has no other consequence. But this will depend on the genome and I do not think it would be a concern for non-plant species.

    If you have access to Pippin instrument ddRAD would be a better choice.

    Comment

    • Pauline dlp
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2018
      • 8

      #3
      Thanks for the reply, nucacidhunter! So it seems methylation sensitivity is more of an issue for plants. I tried doing in silico digests of my reference genome with several REs, and the methylation insensitive ones give a decent number of fragments for the target size (~100-200 bp).

      We do have a PippinPrep, would bring up the possibility of using ddRAD. But i'm not sure I could do that since the project proposal stated GBS methods will be used.

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        GBS is a common name used for even non-restriction enzyme based methods. For instance, Illumina recently released a GBS kit that prepares libraries without RE o. ddRAD generally results in good coverage of tags as there is good control over tag numbers.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        8 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        32 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        40 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...