Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • robins91
    Junior Member
    • May 2018
    • 7

    NGS DNA Library Purification via Dynabeads

    Hello, I could use some help from the community.

    I have built 48 RAD-Seq libraries using a protocol from Tin et al. (2014) designed for use with museum specimens. I have confirmed that the libraries have been built correctly via vector cloning of a positive control. After amplification using Phusion HF DNA Polymerase (40 cycles), all samples have been run on a gel to confirm that bands are produced around ~200 bp.

    Then, I purified the PCR products via Dynabeads MyOne Carboxylic Aid as recommended by Tin et al. (2014). The protocol is as follows:

    1. 10 µl per sample are removed from the bottle. The storage buffer is removed using a magnetic stand. Then, the beads are washed twice in EB and resuspended in EB maintaining the same volume.
    2. 10 µl beads, 40 µl PCR product, and 100 µl of 14.5% PEG-6000 (0.9 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 6) are added.
    3. The solution is incubation at room temperature for 10 minutes. The supernatant is removed using a magnetic stand and discarded. The beads are washed twice with 70% ethanol and air dried at room temperature.
    4. Beads are eluted in 15 µl EB and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant is kept.

    To quantify, I ran a SYBER I Green Assay on all samples and got values between 0.2 ng/µl to 2 ng/µl. Next, I ran some samples of varying quantity (but within the range of the chip’s capabilities) on a Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity Chip. Typically, I rarely get a distribution, and if I do, the concentration is very small. Other times, I am getting unusual distributions that do not seem to have a pattern.

    I have tried reamplifying for an additional 20 cycles and purifying again with no luck. I even replaced Phusion with GoTaq, which gave me unusual distributions. I am not sure what to make of this and believe something is wrong with the purification step. Does anyone have any experience with these beads or know of a solution?

    I have contacted the manufacturers of the beads (Life Technologies), and they suggest high volume of beads and longer incubation times. I have already tried the longer incubation times with a positive control without any luck.

    Thank you in advance.
    Attached Files
  • austinso
    Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 77

    #2
    Frankly, I think there is a typo in the protocol. It shouldn't be pH 6...it really should be pH 8.

    I'm not sure how you were even able to pH Tris to 6.0, since its pKa is 8.3...? i.e. it is no longer a buffer at that pH.

    Comment

    • cement_head
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2012
      • 264

      #3
      What would be the disadvantage of using a spin-column purification, or alternate bead based purification? (i.e. AMPureXP or ProNex)?

      Comment

      • cmbetts
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 120

        #4
        That protocol looks like a scaled down version of the various homebrew AmpureXP recipes out there. It's probably a cost savings measure to avoid the premium on the real deal. I'd agree with the spin column or commercial beads recommendation. You otherwise may end up burning way more cash in troubleshooting than you'd save using the more expensive reagent up front. I'm probably too spoiled by corporate labs, but I find homebrew only saves money if you're going to be running enough reactions in the long run that the math heavily favors DIY.

        Comment

        • cement_head
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 264

          #5
          Originally posted by cmbetts View Post
          That protocol looks like a scaled down version of the various homebrew AmpureXP recipes out there. It's probably a cost savings measure to avoid the premium on the real deal. I'd agree with the spin column or commercial beads recommendation. You otherwise may end up burning way more cash in troubleshooting than you'd save using the more expensive reagent up front. I'm probably too spoiled by corporate labs, but I find homebrew only saves money if you're going to be running enough reactions in the long run that the math heavily favors DIY.
          Yeah, we came to the same conclusion. We tried the new Promega ProNex beads and they worked very well, and they are very, very fast at separating. Thanks.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          44 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...