Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • s_farraj
    Junior Member
    • May 2012
    • 7

    Low QC for R2 from beginning

    Hi all,

    I made 2 runs on Miseq using 300cycles (2X150). I used 2 different library preparation kits. One of them KAPA RNA Hyper prep and the second one Nextera dna flex library prep. The both libraries were normalized manually after I checked their quality by bioanalyzer. the first library was 10pM conc. and the other one 12pM (like the kit recommend). In both runs I got the same problem. The reads of R2 became low from beginning (the pic. attached will clarify the problem).
    Plz if anyone has an explanation for this result, tell me.

    Many thanks
    Attached Files
  • GSviral
    Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 38

    #2
    Hi,

    It looks to me that your run is borderline overclustered from the second image. V2 chemistry recommends a clustering range of 1000 - 1200 K/mm2. This is probably why you are seeing a drop in read quality in R2. You might find the same libraries, loaded at 8 - 9 pM, would bring your clustering within range and produce better quality data.

    I've had some success with slight overclustering using MiSeq V2 chemistry (~1350 K/mm2) still returning really great data but this seems to be dependent on the type of library being sequenced.

    Comment

    • s_farraj
      Junior Member
      • May 2012
      • 7

      #3
      Hi GSviral,

      Thanks for your reply.

      I also have successful runs with 300cycle where the cluster density overpassed 1400K/mm2 but it is the first time for me to see the quality of R2 like that from beginning.

      Comment

      • GSviral
        Member
        • Dec 2014
        • 38

        #4
        Good to hear that those higher cluster densities can still produce good quality data.

        Unfortunately it's hard to predict, one library can produce completely different metrics to another at those densities (and indeed within the specified density range). Since it's only the last 2 runs you have seen this quality drop in R2 I can only say to reduce the cluster density and see if the problem still exists. I would be more concerned if you had seen this quality drop in the last 10 runs consistently, then it may be a fault with library preparation or the machine itself.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...