Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jleehan
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2019
    • 3

    Detecting Known, Low Frequency SNPs in evolving bacterial communities

    Hi all,

    I'm using NGS data to observe how a community of congenic bacteria evolve over time. Basically, I'm starting by inputting several different alleles of one gene into the same medium and seeing how that population changes over time by sequencing the DNA of that gene.

    As far as I can tell, all the SNP calling pipelines appear to be more for genome wide discovery than something like what I am doing.

    Currently, I am using VarScan and LoFreq to determine the allele frequencies in this community. The agreement between the two pipelines is decent, but as of now VarScan doesn't seem to be able to detect samples that are present in less than 20% of the population (despite what was reported in this paper and all the other programs are reported to be even worse) and I would like to be able to use at least two different programs to verify the presence of these alleles.

    Does anyone know of a better low frequency SNP calling pipeline or perhaps a program that allows you to call SNPs based on known alleles (this would actually be the ideal, but I haven't seen anything like this anywhere that I've read)?

    Thanks!

    P.S. I'm relatively new to NGS work so please bear with me if I've made some egregious oversight here.
  • Meyana
    Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 40

    #2
    I have been really pleased with using the variant caller that is a part of the BBTools package for rare variants in mitochondrial DNA.
    Fast, multithreaded bioinformatics tools for DNA/RNA analysis. Over 90 tools for alignment, assembly, QC, and analysis.

    It is not so well documented at that site, but look here for how to use:
    Multi-threaded Distributed Memory Overlap-Layout-Consensus (OLC) Metagenome Assembler - abiswas-odu/Disco

    or throughout this forum.

    Comment

    • jleehan
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2019
      • 3

      #3
      Thank you very much for your recommendation, I'll be sure to check it out!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      8 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...