Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RamP
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 3

    #1

    Aligner for PacBio RNASeq

    I am wondering if I can use BLASR for aligning RNASeq reads from Human cell lines. I am interested in identifying the splice sites. I read this paper "Evaluation of tools for long read RNA-seq splice-aware alignment" (Bioinformatics, 2018) where different splice aware tools were compared and concluded GMAP to be the best among the compared ones. However, they didn't include BLASR in their evaluation. Could the reason be that BLASR is suitable only for genomic read alignments? Thanks.
  • Magdoll
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 31

    #2
    You cannot use BLASR. You can use minimap2, GMAP, STAR, etc.
    A tutorial for these aligners for PacBio RNA (Iso-Seq) data is available here:
    Miscellaneous collection of Python and R scripts for processing Iso-Seq data - Magdoll/cDNA_Cupcake

    Comment

    • RamP
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by Magdoll View Post
      You cannot use BLASR.
      Thanks for your response and the link. What could be the reason for BLASR being not a suitable aligner? I mean, it works like BLAST finding local alignments after incorporating the PacBio error model and that should be good enough to align exon regions on the genome. What am I missing here? Thanks.

      Comment

      • Magdoll
        Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 31

        #4
        BLASR is not splice aware - it cannot map exon-exons. Newer aligners like minimap2 are well equipped to handle errors for PacBio data. For most PacBio RNA-seq (what we call Iso-Seq) data, the error rate would be very low anyway.

        In more practical terms, BLASR is getting phased out. We encourage users to switch to newer aligners like minimap2 that are being actively maintained and developed.

        Comment

        • RamP
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2013
          • 3

          #5
          Thanks for taking time explaining this. One last thing.
          Would Minimap2 be effective enough aligning to non-canonical coding regions, for example, fusion transcripts?
          Perhaps, I should give it a try myself, but thought I would ask anyway.
          Thanks again.
          Last edited by RamP; 02-05-2019, 01:03 AM.

          Comment

          • Magdoll
            Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 31

            #6
            Yes both GMAP and minimap2 could work for fusion detection.

            In GMAP it would be using the `-n 0` parameter which says "only output a single alignment *unless* the best alignment is chimeric" which essentially screens for fusion transcripts when you look for sequences with 2+ alignment results.

            In minimap2 I think it's `--secondary=no`, though admittedly I have tested it less.

            I have a follow up script that processes the SAM files to look for fusion: https://github.com/Magdoll/cDNA_Cupc...ng-step#fusion

            If you have problems using the scripts above, please file through GitHub Issues.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              Yesterday, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            8 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...