Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SDPA_Pet
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 222

    MiSeq amplicon sequencing Primers?

    Hi guys,

    I sent some soil samples to a commercial sequencing center. I do fungal ITS sequencing (300bpX 2 paired-end) Miseq.

    As you know, I use forward and reversed primers when I did PCR. I suppose Paired-end means sequencing twice, right? I suppose they should use forward primers to sequence once and reverse primer to sequence from another time.

    However, I received two mapping files from sequencing center. Both mapping file show they only used forward primer? I am wondering if this is normal?

    I know in our forward primer always better and accurate. Back to old days (Sanger sequencing) we only use forward primers to run sequencing reactions.

    If you guys are familiar with paired-end amplicon sequencing, I am wondering if it is normal to use only one primer to sequence both (paired).

    Thanks,
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    I assume you have done PCR wit ITS region specific primers with no Illumina overhang or full adapter sequences. In this case they must have prepared library by adapter ligation which will result in non-direction library so R1 and R2 can start for some fragments from forward direction and for others from reverse direction.

    You should check some reads from R1 and R2 sequence folders and you should see in both sequences starting with forward and reverse primers, unless they have been sequenced with custom primers or have been trimmed to remove PCR primers.

    Comment

    • SDPA_Pet
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 222

      #3
      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      I assume you have done PCR wit ITS region specific primers with no Illumina overhang or full adapter sequences. In this case they must have prepared library by adapter ligation which will result in non-direction library so R1 and R2 can start for some fragments from forward direction and for others from reverse direction.

      You should check some reads from R1 and R2 sequence folders and you should see in both sequences starting with forward and reverse primers, unless they have been sequenced with custom primers or have been trimmed to remove PCR primers.
      I don't quite understand, but I didn't do PCR. I gave them gDNA. They did the PCR and sequencing for me.

      They didn't give me raw fastq files such as R1 and R2. They only give me a combined fasta file. I only find adapter sequence and forward primer sequences in the fast file. I don't they if they removed reversed primers or they only did sequencing using forward primer.

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        Paired end sequencing means that library fragments (in this case ITS amplicons) are sequenced from both ends so R1 and R2 of the fragment are in opposite direction. If sequencing cycles are longer than library fragment then R1 nad R2 can be merged (if there is enough overlap). You can ask the sequencing centre to provide at least the workflow and that should answer your question.

        Comment

        • SDPA_Pet
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 222

          #5
          Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
          Paired end sequencing means that library fragments (in this case ITS amplicons) are sequenced from both ends so R1 and R2 of the fragment are in opposite direction. If sequencing cycles are longer than library fragment then R1 nad R2 can be merged (if there is enough overlap). You can ask the sequencing centre to provide at least the workflow and that should answer your question.
          “R1 and R2 of the fragment are in oppossite direction". -- I know this. However, my question is when they sequence R1 and R2, do they have to use two primers? For example, R1 uses forward primer and R2 uses reverse primer.

          Or they even don't have to use the PCR primer? They use universal primers?

          Comment

          • nucacidhunter
            Jafar Jabbari
            • Jan 2013
            • 1250

            #6
            R1 and R2 are sequenced with different primers. Sequencing primers could be one of Illumina sequencing primers or custom primers based on amplicon sequence. The primer choice is based on library prep workflow and design.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            30 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            34 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...