Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kujin Kwon
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2018
    • 9

    Size selected library is not amplified

    Hi all,

    I'm trying to make RNA library using "NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina"
    After final amplification, I found that dimers are found in library product by Bioanalyzer. Therefore, I extract 300~400bp region by gel elution (Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit, TAE 2% gel).
    As total amount of library is too low for sequencing (sequencing company require at least 50ng), I tried to PCR them with same protocol that I used in final amplification step.
    However, my library was not amplified. As other colleagues use gel elution kit for cloning, I think there is nothing wrong with kit.

    Is there anyone who experienced same problems? or any suggestions that i missing?
  • luc
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 469

    #2
    Your sequencing company asks for way too much library.

    However, the amplification clearly should have worked as described. I would guess a simple mistake at the PCR setup is the most likely explanation or gel cleanup elution into a wrong buffer?

    Comment

    • Kujin Kwon
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2018
      • 9

      #3
      Thank you for your suggestion.

      I'll try to change elution buffer to 0.1xTE or Nuclease free water.

      Comment

      • luc
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 469

        #4
        The recommended buffer would be EB (10 mM Tris, pH=8 to 8.4) or EBT (10mM TRIS, 0,1%Tween20) .

        Comment

        • jhalpin
          Member
          • Jan 2015
          • 26

          #5
          If there is a mistake in your adapter ligation you may not get amplification, since the indices are the primers for amplification. It would also account for the large number of dimers, potentially.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...