Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tamu_anand
    Junior Member
    • May 2011
    • 8

    Has anyone used BBTools package to remove contaminants

    I would like to remove mitochondrial, chloroplast and rDNA contaminants from read data using BBTools - I was wondering if anyone has used BBTools to do this and can share the generic pipeline.

    Thanks in advance.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    There is no pipeline needed. You can provide contaminants you want to remove as fasta sequence in a file.

    While you could use `bbduk.sh` you may want to use `bbsplit.sh` in this case to bin the reads into ones you don't want (based on the list above) and the rest. You can find bbsplit thread here.

    Ask if you need information/run into issues.

    Comment

    • tamu_anand
      Junior Member
      • May 2011
      • 8

      #3
      Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
      There is no pipeline needed. You can provide contaminants you want to remove as fasta sequence in a file.

      While you could use `bbduk.sh` you may want to use `bbsplit.sh` in this case to bin the reads into ones you don't want (based on the list above) and the rest. You can find bbsplit thread here.

      Ask if you need information/run into issues.
      Thanks @GenoMax for pointing me to the bbsplit thread

      To elaborate, I would like to remove chloroplast/rDNA/mito contaminants and I was thinking I would do something like

      Code:
      bbmap.sh in=read_1.fq.gz ref=rRNA_Chlor_Mito.fa maxindel=1 minid=0.95 outu=clean_read_1.fq.gz nodisk
      I am basing the above command on a post by Brian here: https://www.biostars.org/p/143019/#210890

      The strategy here is to use the rRNA+Mito+Chloroplast file and map the reads using bbmap, then collect the unmapped reads (clean_read_1.fq.gz) for my downstream analysis.

      I would appreciate any inputs/suggestions to the above bbmap command line options.

      Also, Is it better to use bbsplit instead of bbmap?

      Comment

      • tamu_anand
        Junior Member
        • May 2011
        • 8

        #4
        Hi all

        Any inputs/recommendations on the bbmap command line I am using - Post 3

        Thanks in advance

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          You can certainly use Brian's recommendation above. If you wish to find out how many reads actually map to those individual references (e.g. rRNA, mito etc) then using bbsplit.sh would be useful since it will give you that statistics.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Yesterday, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...