Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gringer
    David Eccles (gringer)
    • May 2011
    • 845

    #16
    Originally posted by Haiqu View Post
    In any case, I can't see any valid reason to be paying return shipping to the UK if the device is merely going to be disposed of.
    Customers don't pay return shipping to the UK. That cost is met by ONT, even for flow cells that are being returned from New Zealand. I suppose if you want to be cynical, you could say the return shipping cost is included in the price of the flow cells.

    I can't see a hobbyist needing to handle the volumes for 12-sample multiplexing, and the learning curve for barcoding would complicate an already complex procedure.
    You can either multiplex and reduce the per-sample cost, or not multiplex and get a higher yield per sample. Flongle flow cells ($100 USD each, for about 1/10 of the yield) make that decision a bit more palatable. There's essentially no learning curve for rapid barcoding on top of standard rapid sample prep. Here's the normal sample prep:
    1. Add 2.5μl fragmentation mix to 7.5μl sample in a sample tube
    2. Heat to 30°C for 1 min, then 80°C for 1 min
    3. Add 1μl adapter mix, Wait 5 mins
    4. Mix with sequencing buffer and load onto flow cell


    Here's the barcoded sample prep:
    1. Add 2.5μl barcoded fragmentation mix to 7.5μl of each sample in a sample tube
    2. Heat to 30°C for 1 min, then 80°C for 1 min
    3. Mix all the prepared samples together
    4. Put 10μl into a new tube
    5. Add 1μl adapter mix, Wait 5 mins
    6. Mix with sequencing buffer and load onto flow cell


    Sure, it's two more steps, but it doesn't involve any more learning.

    A more likely scenario is use and rewash of the flow cell, where maybe 4 or 5 samples can be read at best.
    Yes, that can be done as well. ONT provide a wash kit for $190 that works for 12 rewashes, but people have discovered (with ONT's help) that a nuclease flush is actually more effective (carryover with a nuclease flush is something like 0.01% vs 1-5% with the wash kit).

    It works. Depending on how much yield you want, a flow cell can be washed and re-used for 8 runs.

    However, the flow cells contain ions that pass from one side of the membrane to the other, and these deplete over time through using the flow cell. Due to this, sequencing is more effective (i.e. produces a higher yield) when a flow cell is fresh, so you will get a much higher yield from 8 samples multiplexed, than from 8 samples washed and run one after the other. There's also a bit of a risk when washing a flow cell of damaging the sequencing membrane.

    [that's one of ONT's protected technologies - a polymer membrane that is transport-stable, with nice electrical properties that make it easy to load single nanopores and hard to load more than one]

    With single flow cells being $900 (plus reagents at several hundred bucks) the cost will be more like $300 per sample, especially when you take into account that they have a limited (12 week) shelf life.
    It depends on the application. A flongle flow cell with a rapid barcoding kit requiring low yield (50-100 Mb / sample) works out to about $9 / sample [as I've already mentioned]. A single whole genome sample (5-15 Gb) with a MinION flow cell and 1/6th of a ligation kit is $1000 USD for ONT reagents, plus another $100ish for NEB reagents and Ampure beads.

    The 12-week shelf life is ONT's warranty period. Many ONT community users (including me) have found that flow cells will last for over a year. I have done washes of used 6-month-old flow cells with well-expired rapid kits, and got enough sequence out of the flow cells to assemble viral genomes.

    For some people, I appreciate that the cost of a $100 flow cell will be beyond them, and they may not be able to take 1/144th of a rapid barcoding kit from someone who has some spare. But saying that's completely out of the price range of a hobby / home user seems a bit odd to me.

    Comment

    • gringer
      David Eccles (gringer)
      • May 2011
      • 845

      #17
      Hobby Money

      Originally posted by Haiqu View Post
      In any case, I can't see any valid reason to be paying return shipping to the UK if the device is merely going to be disposed of.
      Customers don't pay return shipping to the UK. That cost is met by ONT, even for flow cells that are being returned from New Zealand. I suppose if you want to be cynical, you could say the return shipping cost is included in the price of the flow cells.

      I can't see a hobbyist needing to handle the volumes for 12-sample multiplexing, and the learning curve for barcoding would complicate an already complex procedure.
      You can either multiplex and reduce the per-sample cost, or not multiplex and get a higher yield per sample. Flongle flow cells ($100 USD each, for about 1/10 of the yield) make that decision a bit more palatable. There's essentially no learning curve for rapid barcoding on top of standard rapid sample prep. Here's the normal sample prep:
      1. Add 2.5μl fragmentation mix to 7.5μl sample in a sample tube
      2. Heat to 30°C for 1 min, then 80°C for 1 min
      3. Add 1μl adapter mix, Wait 5 mins
      4. Mix with sequencing buffer and load onto flow cell


      Here's the barcoded sample prep:
      1. Add 2.5μl barcoded fragmentation mix to 7.5μl of each sample in a sample tube
      2. Heat to 30°C for 1 min, then 80°C for 1 min
      3. Mix all the prepared samples together
      4. Put 10μl into a new tube
      5. Add 1μl adapter mix, Wait 5 mins
      6. Mix with sequencing buffer and load onto flow cell


      Sure, it's two more steps, but it doesn't involve any more learning.

      A more likely scenario is use and rewash of the flow cell, where maybe 4 or 5 samples can be read at best.
      Yes, that can be done as well. ONT provide a wash kit for $190 that works for 12 rewashes, but people have discovered (with ONT's help) that a nuclease flush is actually more effective (carryover with a nuclease flush is something like 0.01% vs 1-5% with the wash kit).

      It works. Depending on how much yield you want, a flow cell can be washed and re-used for 8 runs, probably more.

      However, the flow cells contain ions that pass from one side of the membrane to the other, and these deplete over time through using the flow cell. Due to this, sequencing is more effective (i.e. produces a higher yield) when a flow cell is fresh, so you will get a much higher yield from 8 samples multiplexed, than from 8 samples washed and run one after the other. There's also a bit of a risk when washing a flow cell of damaging the sequencing membrane.

      [that's one of ONT's protected technologies - a polymer membrane that is transport-stable, with nice electrical properties that make it easy to load single nanopores and hard to load more than one.]

      With single flow cells being $900 (plus reagents at several hundred bucks) the cost will be more like $300 per sample, especially when you take into account that they have a limited (12 week) shelf life.
      It depends on the application. A flongle flow cell with a rapid barcoding kit requiring low yield (50-100 Mb / sample) works out to about $9 / sample [as I've already mentioned]. A single whole genome sample (5-15 Gb) with a MinION flow cell and 1/6th of a ligation kit is $1000 USD for ONT reagents, plus another $100ish for NEB reagents and Ampure beads.

      The 12-week shelf life is ONT's warranty period. Many ONT community users (including me) have found that flow cells will last for over a year. I have done washes of used 6-month-old flow cells with well-expired rapid kits, and got enough sequence out of the flow cells to assemble viral genomes.

      For some people, I appreciate that the cost of a $100 flow cell will be beyond them, and they may not be able to take 1/144th of a rapid barcoding kit from someone who has some spare. But saying that's completely out of the price range of a hobby / home user seems a bit odd to me.

      Comment

      • Haiqu
        Member
        • Aug 2019
        • 19

        #18
        Originally posted by gringer View Post
        Customers don't pay return shipping to the UK. That cost is met by ONT, even for flow cells that are being returned from New Zealand. I suppose if you want to be cynical, you could say the return shipping cost is included in the price of the flow cells.
        The return shipping price is built into that exorbitant $900.00 per cell.

        You can either multiplex and reduce the per-sample cost, or not multiplex and get a higher yield per sample. Flongle flow cells ($100 USD each, for about 1/10 of the yield) make that decision a bit more palatable. There's essentially no learning curve for rapid barcoding on top of standard rapid sample prep. Here's the normal sample prep:
        1. Add 2.5μl fragmentation mix to 7.5μl sample in a sample tube
        2. Heat to 30°C for 1 min, then 80°C for 1 min
        3. Add 1μl adapter mix, Wait 5 mins
        4. Mix with sequencing buffer and load onto flow cell


        Here's the barcoded sample prep:
        1. Add 2.5μl barcoded fragmentation mix to 7.5μl of each sample in a sample tube
        2. Heat to 30°C for 1 min, then 80°C for 1 min
        3. Mix all the prepared samples together
        4. Put 10μl into a new tube
        5. Add 1μl adapter mix, Wait 5 mins
        6. Mix with sequencing buffer and load onto flow cell


        Sure, it's two more steps, but it doesn't involve any more learning.
        Doesn't sound too bad, but you're glossing over the process needed to barcode the samples. That might well be simple too, but from here I can't tell. It's also a trade-off between number of samples and test resolution. I can't see 800 cells / 12 barcoded samples being particularly useful except perhaps for identifying well-known small virii. I expect to be doing de novo plant work at first, and from what I've seen of other people's work online, they go through a full MinION cell per test and still have trouble piecing together a complete sequence.

        But as I've said, I am a noob, albeit a determined one. I'll get back to you in three months when I've completed the MIT 7.00x Introduction to Biology course I just started. After which I'll be doing the 7.QBWx Quantitative Biology Workshop, to be able to handle the data crunching we already discussed.

        The 12-week shelf life is ONT's warranty period. Many ONT community users (including me) have found that flow cells will last for over a year. I have done washes of used 6-month-old flow cells with well-expired rapid kits, and got enough sequence out of the flow cells to assemble viral genomes.
        From what I read, they have to returned if not used within 12 weeks, but I can't imagine anyone taking that seriously. They certainly need to be tested within that timeframe for warranty coverage.

        For some people, I appreciate that the cost of a $100 flow cell will be beyond them, and they may not be able to take 1/144th of a rapid barcoding kit from someone who has some spare. But saying that's completely out of the price range of a hobby / home user seems a bit odd to me.
        The US$90 flow cell is used with the Flongle, which is another US$1,860 on top of the cost of the MinION. So now, with chemicals, we're up well over three grand for that first sample test. That's why I'm so disappointed that the SmidgION isn't available yet, it's an all-in-one unit. However I don't expect it to be very useful, and the value for money will always with the unit that handles the most workflow.

        Comment

        • Haiqu
          Member
          • Aug 2019
          • 19

          #19
          Just following up on the SmidgION ... it will not be available for at least two years, according to Oxford Nanopore.

          Comment

          • Haiqu
            Member
            • Aug 2019
            • 19

            #20
            Originally posted by r.rosati View Post
            4. The chips can be cleaned and reused indefinitely if you're willing to put up with minor contamination (83% clean is what I've been told.)

            Hi. Do you actually have a protocol for that? I've tried, unsuccessfully.
            Did you ever get a response from that Russian guy who built his own sequencer with the Ion Torrent chip? I tried and have had no reply after three weeks.

            Comment

            • scrosby
              Director, GTAC, Washington U.
              • Nov 2009
              • 32

              #21
              Originally posted by Haiqu View Post
              Did you ever get a response from that Russian guy who built his own sequencer with the Ion Torrent chip? I tried and have had no reply after three weeks.
              I just sent him a note about this which is pretty cool!
              New equipment in the lab. Why buy a fancy microscope with a screen when you can use a USB eyepiece instead? I love this!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
              0 responses
              14 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              31 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
              0 responses
              40 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
              0 responses
              26 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...