Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kgoglin
    Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 17

    qPCR standard variability with Kapa kit

    We have been using Kapa's qPCR kit for Illumina library quantification for years. This year, it has given us great problems with inconsistent standards.

    We have seen perfect triplicates one day and highly variable triplicates the next with the same standards. We store the standard aliquots at -20 to avoid freeze/thaws. We clean the hood prior to every run. We have tried different tubes, switching to lo bind for standard storage. We had all our pipets calibrated. We also have even changed qPCR instruments!

    Has anyone else experienced this with Kapa's kit? Since we cannot find a solution, we will begin testing NEBNext's qPCR quant kit. Hopefully that will be the solution.
  • GSviral
    Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 38

    #2
    Hi kgoglin,

    When I previously used the KAPA qPCR quantification method I also ran into the same problem from time to time. Sometimes triplicate standards could be very variable between runs even though I took all the precautions you mentioned in your post. Additionally, I used to run PhiX as a control on a KAPA run. Although I know the concentration of PhiX can be variable, sometimes I was getting absolutely wild results from a quantification run, completely out of the range I would expect the PhiX concentration to fall in. I never found out what the problem was.

    Subsequently, my lab changed to NEB qPCR quantification and the last I heard it was performing really well for them so hopefully you will see some reliable results when you use it.

    Comment

    • kgoglin
      Member
      • Dec 2014
      • 17

      #3
      Hi GSviral,
      Thank you for response. We have also begun to include PhiX as a control and it can be variable also.

      We are testing the NEBNext kit today with PhiX as a control. Hoping for good results!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...