Maybe, MGISEQ is better.
-
-
Done! Two years late! -
For what it's worth (there's very littel traffic here anyway):
I think this should be renamed back to Complete Genomics, and a new forum should be created for MGISEQ instruments. Most of the questions/answers here are either 1) not relevant to MGI or CG, or 2) they're CG-data/analysis specific questions. The MGI instruments have basically thrown away all the sequencing technology used by CG, and only the Nanoball/'clustering' method is retained. The instruments are quite different too.
Cheers,
Scott.Comment
-
I agree with you. Now the naming should be changed to DNBSEQ according to the company website.Originally posted by ECO View Post
Comment
-
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.
We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing...
Comment