Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #1

    SOLiD WTP alignment file: representation of spliced reads

    Hi

    I've got a data set with SOLiD RNA-Seq data that was aligned with SOLiD's whole transcriptome analysis pipeline (WTP 1.2.1). This software produces a GFF file that represents each read with one line, or, if the read straddles a splice junction, wth two lines (which are usually not next to each other).

    I have trouble understanding how the spliced reads are represented.

    Here is a normal read:
    Code:
    chr2L   wtp     read    75079   75113   30      +       .       bd=1445_1152_746_F3;rs=16;mm=0;g=T12003120303000210002013210322101003330110312122223;i=1;
    There are 0 mismatches (mm=0) and 16 bases skipped (rs=16). if I convert the read to sequence space and extract the part at the indicated coordinates from my refernce FASTA, this alignes nicely:

    Code:
    TGAAATGAATTAAAAGTTTTCCATCAATCTGGTTTATAACAATGACTCTCG  [read]
                    TTTTCCATCAATCTGGTTTATAACAATGACTCTCG  [reference, 2L:75079-75113]
    ----------------  [ <-- 16 skipped]
    Now for a spliced read. This bead ID here appears twice:

    Code:
    chr2L   wtp     read    108217  108226  45      +       .       bd=1636_459_310_F3;rs=1;mm=0;g=T32012102331321332201132130130000113020000230013032;i=1;jp=108588;jt=k;
    chr2L   wtp     read    108588  108622  45      +       .       bd=1636_459_310_F3;rs=1;mm=0;g=T32012102331321332201132130130000113020000230013032;i=1;jp=108217;jt=k;
    The two lines refer each others starting positions via the 'jp' attribute. However if I extract the indicates positions, there is no match:

    Code:
    TAGGTCAAGCGTAGTATCTTGTAGTAACGGGGGTGCCTTTTTCGGGTAATC   [read]
     CTCAGAATCA                                           [reference, 2L:108217-108226]
               CTCCACCAACAATTTAGCCGACCGGAACTCGGGTT        [reference, 2L:108588-108622]
    I can't find these reference parts anywhere in the read.

    I tried many different reads, and always, the non-spliced ones agree with the reference (unless there are mismatches, causing the colour space decoding to lose sync) and the spliced ones don't. Do I have to do something different if I decode colour space for a spliced read? Do I misunderstand the WTP output format? Or is something going severely wrong here?

    Thanks for any hints

    Simon
    Last edited by Simon Anders; 08-23-2010, 02:55 AM. Reason: corrected GFF excerpt

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...