Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • A.R.T
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2021
    • 2

    Missing value in ALT alleles for VCF file

    Hi
    I am working on my VCF files (mapped to GRCh37) which contains some missing values in ALT allele site. While there is (.) instead of allele name, the REF allele and variant rs_number in addition to other details are provided. Would you please let me know how can I fix it? Is there any special tool for retrieving missing variants in VCF?

    example:

    chr22 42523943 rs16947 A .
  • dcameron
    Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 27

    #2
    It's likely that your coverage at that position is too low for the variant caller to make any call.

    > Would you please let me know how can I fix it?

    Verify that these variants are indeed called as MISSING due to insufficient coverage. If this is indeed the case, you need to sequence more, or explicitly handle missing variants in your pipeline.

    Comment

    • A.R.T
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2021
      • 2

      #3
      Originally posted by dcameron View Post
      It's likely that your coverage at that position is too low for the variant caller to make any call.

      > Would you please let me know how can I fix it?

      Verify that these variants are indeed called as MISSING due to insufficient coverage. If this is indeed the case, you need to sequence more, or explicitly handle missing variants in your pipeline.


      Thank you @dcameron. I noticed that missing positions appeared after I did genome liftover by NCBI tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/tools/remap). So, my original VCFs do not contain any missing variant. I think I have to choose another tool for converting my GRCh38 vcfs to GRCh37.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...