Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • James
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 23

    Paired end Illumina prep problems?

    Hi people.

    I was wondering if anybody had had any problems with the illumina protocol for making the libraries for paired end sequencing. We previously did some ChIP-seq before (not paired end) and the first time we ran into problems with primer dimers and had to lower primer and adapter concentrations.

    This time we are sequencing DNA (not ChIPed), are there any similar common problems? And do you do the PCR enrichment, I hear some people are missing this out and getting good results?

    Cheers, James
  • SeqR&D
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 26

    #2
    Hey James,

    What is PCR enrichment? I have made many PE libraries and do not run into too many issues. I follow the illumina protocol. Have you tried making these libraries yet? How much DNA are you starting with?

    Comment

    • James
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 23

      #3
      Hi,

      By PCR enrichment. I mean one of the last steps in the protocol where you do 10-12 PCR cycles. I just read the protocol in a bit more detail it seems it is actually essential for adding sequence on the end of the adaptors. Never mind.

      I'm aiming to start the library prep with 5ug. Do you do the 10 cycles the protocol recommends?

      Thanks, Just wanted to scope out see If there was anything in the protocol that everyone changes before starting. I haven't made these libraries yet.

      Cheers, J

      Comment

      • SeqR&D
        Member
        • Sep 2010
        • 26

        #4
        Okay...I get it.

        Yes, I do this PCR...both to add the correct sequence for sequencing, and to ensure that you have library with correctly orientated adapters. I generally do 14 cycles, but this really depends on you. I have done up to 16 cycles. (I may have different applications though) The lower the better, I would imagine...less amplification = better diversity. Also, I have started using Ampure beads instead of column purifications...should give you more yield.

        Good luck!

        Comment

        • cliffbeall
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 144

          #5
          PCR free method

          A method without the PCR step was published by Kozarewa et al in Nature Methods 6, 291 - 295 (2009). Link The different ends are inherent in the "Y" ligation, the solution PCR is only needed to get enough material to quantify before running. The authors get around that by quantitating using Q-PCR. It does require custom adapters that are longer than the commercial ones.

          I was thinking of trying it- I am trying to get as accurate as possible reflection of the input. Its probably not a routine kind of thing one would want to do, unless there is some kind of specific need.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Today, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          8 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          29 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...