Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottC
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 244

    What's your favourite qPCR kit for Illumina library QC?

    Hi All,

    Just wondering which kits (if any) people are using for QC-ing Illumina libraries? From what I've read so far, people seem to like the Kappa kits.

    Cheers,

    Scott.
    Last edited by ScottC; 09-28-2010, 03:00 PM.
  • Protaeus
    Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 21

    #2
    I concur with the rumors you have heard - the Kapa kit has given me consistent and reproducible concentrations. I recommend running a qPCR on your pools as an extra QC check if you are multiplexing.

    Comment

    • antoniou
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 7

      #3
      I Agree. The Kappa kits have been great. our cluster numbers are very consistent since we started using the kit (6 months ago)
      Eric

      Comment

      • GW_OK
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 411

        #4
        We use and love the Kappa kit as well when used in conjunction with a Bioanalyzer for sizing.

        Comment

        • NextGenSeq
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 482

          #5
          What else is there besides KAPA?

          Comment

          • ScottC
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 244

            #6
            There's a few options... Kappa, many 'DIY' systems, Agilent, etc.

            Comment

            • theward
              Junior Member
              • Jul 2012
              • 6

              #7
              From reading this and other threads most people prefer the KAPA kits to run qPCR for library quantification. Can anyone tell me why these kits are superior to the SYBR green kits as my understanding is they're more expensive? If it to do with the standards being normalised could you not just use your own library to generate a standard curve with the SYBR green kits?
              Any advice most welcome!

              Comment

              • kwaraska
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 131

                #8
                We use the Kappa enzyme mix with our own primers and use PhiX as a standard curve.

                The main reason we don't use the Quant Kit itself is it is far more expensive than buying the enzyme and primers seperately. That being said, we are a core so we are generally QCing 20 or more samples at a time so the standard curve is but a small component of the cost.

                Comment

                • cdalgard
                  Member
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 12

                  #9
                  What are the primer sequences for this and is this for TruSeq libraries?

                  Comment

                  • megalodon
                    Member
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 20

                    #10
                    Check Illumina's qPCR protocol. The primer sequences are listed in there.

                    We are also using the Kapa master mix together with our own primers and PhiX as standard for qPCR. While we are also getting fairly consistent results, our qPCRs tend to overestimate the concentration of our libraries, especially for RNA-seq libraries. Has anyone else seen this? We also tried the Kapa primers and standards but got similar results.

                    Comment

                    • theward
                      Junior Member
                      • Jul 2012
                      • 6

                      #11
                      Can I ask how you are sizing your libraries to calculate molarity? Is it the Bioanalyzer/Tapestation? If not, how do you size them?

                      Comment

                      • pmiguel
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2008
                        • 2328

                        #12
                        Originally posted by megalodon View Post
                        Check Illumina's qPCR protocol. The primer sequences are listed in there.

                        We are also using the Kapa master mix together with our own primers and PhiX as standard for qPCR. While we are also getting fairly consistent results, our qPCRs tend to overestimate the concentration of our libraries, especially for RNA-seq libraries. Has anyone else seen this? We also tried the Kapa primers and standards but got similar results.
                        Just a word of warning: we have found the Illumina phiX libraries to be variable in concentration. Differences observable even using a high sensitivity chip.

                        We get lower batch to batch variability using Kapa's own standard.

                        --
                        Phillip

                        Comment

                        • oliwakun
                          Junior Member
                          • Sep 2013
                          • 1

                          #13
                          Qpcr

                          Originally posted by ScottC View Post
                          There's a few options... Kappa, many 'DIY' systems, Agilent, etc.
                          Yeah, you should try Agilent. Got the best kits at affordable prices. Ask to speak to Abraham (Bioreagents Specialist) and he can advise you on what to get. Company number is 0845 712 5292 Option 3 then 1

                          Comment

                          • cement_head
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2012
                            • 264

                            #14
                            Hello,

                            We've had excellent results with the KAPA kit (universal) recommended by Illumina. It's a tad expensive ($575) - but it enables you to really get very accurate potential clustering QC data.

                            - Andor

                            Comment

                            • addyblanch
                              Member
                              • Jul 2012
                              • 29

                              #15
                              The KAPA kit is a SYBR green mixture.

                              Comment

                              Latest Articles

                              Collapse

                              • SEQadmin2
                                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                                by SEQadmin2



                                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                                ...
                                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                              • SEQadmin2
                                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                                by SEQadmin2



                                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                              • GATTACAT
                                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                                by GATTACAT
                                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                              ad_right_rmr

                              Collapse

                              News

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
                              0 responses
                              13 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                              0 responses
                              26 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                              0 responses
                              16 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                              0 responses
                              33 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Working...