Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oliviera
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 31

    coverage required

    Dear all,

    I try to get an idea of the base coverage required for the different sequencing applications.
    I didn t find any review on this subject so if you know a nice paper or can complete the followings, your are more than welcome:

    - whole genome resequencing: 40x genome size (Nature 464, 587-591)
    - SNPs call: 31x genome size (Genome Res. 2010. 20: 273-280)
    - de novo genome modelling: 100x ??
    - de novo transcriptome modelling: 100x??
    - transcript expression studies: ??


    Oliviera
  • malachig
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 117

    #2
    The relationship between library depth and transcript expression profiling is discussed at some length in the supplementary materials of Nature Methods. 2010 Oct;7(10):843-847 (ALEXA-Seq).

    The Trans-ABySS manuscript provides an example of de novo transcriptome assembly that might be helpful.

    Comment

    • francois.sabot
      Member
      • Dec 2009
      • 41

      #3
      Originally posted by oliviera View Post

      - whole genome resequencing: 40x genome size (Nature 464, 587-591)
      This amount of 'x' depend also of the size of your reads: longer reads need less coverage for the same efficiency
      Francois Sabot, PhD

      Be realistic. Demand the Impossible.
      www.wikiposon.org

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...