Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ccqqsunshine
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 1

    DNA contamination in mRNA seq prepare

    Dear all,

    I am frustrated with the contamination of DNA in my RNA sample,while treated with DNAse I(takara.) and extracted with phenol again,it seams all RNA were lost.

    Any reconmondations for inactivation the DNAse1 instead?
    thans for all and best wishes.


    chenchen
  • shurjo
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 132

    #2
    Originally posted by ccqqsunshine View Post
    Dear all,

    I am frustrated with the contamination of DNA in my RNA sample,while treated with DNAse I(takara.) and extracted with phenol again,it seams all RNA were lost.

    Any reconmondations for inactivation the DNAse1 instead?
    thans for all and best wishes.


    chenchen
    I use the Qiagen RNase-Free DNase kit with the RNAeasy Mini columns and they work just fine for me. No inactivation needed, the DNase I is just washed out on the column.

    Comment

    • greigite
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 145

      #3
      We use Ambion's Turbo DNA-free and it works great. Using standard DNAse protocols resulted in significant fragmentation of our RNA, which maybe is what happened to the OP.

      Comment

      • CC_seqanswers
        Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 30

        #4
        Could you elaborate a bit on the experience with Turbo? It worked great for you in terms of very low gDNA reads in the data? good yield of RNA? Have you compared the data between treatment and non-treatment? Thanks!

        CC

        Originally posted by greigite View Post
        We use Ambion's Turbo DNA-free and it works great. Using standard DNAse protocols resulted in significant fragmentation of our RNA, which maybe is what happened to the OP.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        8 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        44 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        104 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        125 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...