Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Newsbot!
    Banned
    • Feb 2008
    • 1331

    RNA-Seq: ISOFORM ABUNDANCE INFERENCE PROVIDES A MORE ACCURATE ESTIMATION OF GENE EXPR

    Syndicated from PubMed RSS Feeds

    ISOFORM ABUNDANCE INFERENCE PROVIDES A MORE ACCURATE ESTIMATION OF GENE EXPRESSION LEVELS IN RNA-SEQ.

    J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2010 Dec;8(supp01):177-192

    Authors: Wang X, Wu Z, Zhang X

    Due to its unprecedented high-resolution and detailed information, RNA-seq technology based on next-generation high-throughput sequencing significantly boosts the ability to study transcriptomes. The estimation of genes' transcript abundance levels or gene expression levels has always been an important question in research on the transcriptional regulation and gene functions. On the basis of the concept of Reads Per Kilo-base per Million reads (RPKM), taking the union-intersection genes (UI-based) and summing up inferred isoform abundance (isoform-based) are the two current strategies to estimate gene expression levels, but produce different estimations. In this paper, we made the first attempt to compare the two strategies' performances through a series of simulation studies. Our results showed that the isoform-based method gives not only more accurate estimation but also has less uncertainty than the UI-based strategy. If taking into account the non-uniformity of read distribution, the isoform-based method can further reduce estimation errors. We applied both strategies to real RNA-seq datasets of technical replicates, and found that the isoform-based strategy also displays a better performance. For a more accurate estimation of gene expression levels from RNA-seq data, even if the abundance levels of isoforms are not of interest, it is still better to first infer the isoform abundance and sum them up to get the expression level of a gene as a whole.

    PMID: 21155027 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



    More...

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
53 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...