Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sarjo
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 5

    gDNA for Illumina--how pure is pure?

    Hi all--

    I am an old timey AFLP person moving into next gen. I intend to generate PE reads from a reduced representation library of insect DNA, and am worried about my DNA:

    1. Genomic DNA was extracted with Qiagen kits, but with no RNase treatment.
    2. On agarose gels I see a strong band of intact DNA plus a schmear; at the lowest size range in some samples, I see what I think is an RNA schmear.
    3. I have successfully used these samples for AFLP work using capillary electrophoresis. No problems were evident in terms of restriction/ligation/amplification performance.
    4. In preparing libraries, I will size select after ligation, and again after PCR if the size range of fragments warrants it.

    My question: Given that I will be size selecting, and that restriction/ligation has worked on these samples, is the degraded DNA/presence of RNA going to screw things up? I am worried that my AFLP expertise is going to be totally useless here!
  • sarjo
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 5

    #2
    picture

    In hopes of encouraging a reply, I have attached a photo of one of my quantitation gels to show what I'm concerned about.

    Any advice would be most welcome!
    Attached Files

    Comment

    • cliffbeall
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 144

      #3
      If it were me, I would probably RNAse (be sure to heat treat the RNAse to get rid of DNAse), Phenol extact, and EtOH ppt. The Illumina adapters and reagents are pretty expensive. But I haven't tried a sample with that much RNA contamination.

      Comment

      • peromhc
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 108

        #4
        Sarjo, Why not Bioanalyze these samples to get a better handle on RNA/DNA size, quantity, etc...

        The gel's like you show would cause me to worry, and unless the samples are unique, redo the extraction.

        Comment

        • Michael.James.Clark
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 207

          #5
          It will probably be okay, but why not go ahead and RNAse treat those samples? You can just re-do the Qiagen step with RNAse this time. See if that gets rid of the smear.
          Mendelian Disorder: A blogshare of random useful information for general public consumption. [Blog]
          Breakway: A Program to Identify Structural Variations in Genomic Data [Website] [Forum Post]
          Projects: U87MG whole genome sequence [Website] [Paper]

          Comment

          • sarjo
            Junior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 5

            #6
            Thanks very much guys! I am new to this and having newbie anxiety--having some feedback from experienced NGSers helps enormously.

            In regard to your suggestions:

            peromhc: I don't have direct access to a bioanalyzer, but I could ask a nearby lab to run some samples for me.

            Michael and cliffbeall: Regarding redoing the Qiagen from RNAse onward, I can't seem to find ANY info about whether this will work given that my DNA is in elution buffer now. Do you guys have experience with this?

            The samples are unique and represent a few years of selection, crosses, and assays--so I am very scared of compromising them. In some cases I have no more tissue available; in others, re-extraction would be an option.

            Comment

            • Michael.James.Clark
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2009
              • 207

              #7
              Yeah, I've done it from the EB. It will work. Just re-extract it from the EB using the same kit.

              If you have questions about the Qiagen stuff, they have very good customer support reps on the phone. You might want to give them a call before hand and make sure everything will come out the way you want--just tell them you forgot to do RNAse treatment and ask what you should do.
              Mendelian Disorder: A blogshare of random useful information for general public consumption. [Blog]
              Breakway: A Program to Identify Structural Variations in Genomic Data [Website] [Forum Post]
              Projects: U87MG whole genome sequence [Website] [Paper]

              Comment

              • sarjo
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2011
                • 5

                #8
                Many thanks, Michael. I will do as you suggest. I'm always a bit chary of customer service, as the fix often seems to be "buy this other thing from us," but now I think I know exactly how to frame my question. You are so nice to take the time to help!

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                16 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                17 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                54 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...