Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nikhil.stephen
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 2

    BFAST using GPUs

    Dear Sir,

    We are Computer Engineering Students. We have read the BFAST paper


    We are trying to implement it using GPUs.(CUDA) But we are facing some trouble with the indexing bit.
    Could you explain or provide sources for more information on how BFAST creates a reference genome and how indexing is done?
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    Originally posted by nikhil.stephen View Post
    Dear Sir,

    We are Computer Engineering Students. We have read the BFAST paper


    We are trying to implement it using GPUs.(CUDA) But we are facing some trouble with the indexing bit.
    Could you explain or provide sources for more information on how BFAST creates a reference genome and how indexing is done?
    The best place to look would be the source code found at http://bfast.sourceforge.net, especially "RGIndex.{c,h}" and "RGBinary.{c,h}".

    Comment

    • csoong
      Member
      • Jun 2009
      • 74

      #3
      this will be interesting. good luck!

      Comment

      • nikhil.stephen
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 2

        #4
        difficulty in understanding code

        @nilshomer
        we are 4th year students doing our final year project and we tried understanding the code given in "RGIndex.{c,h}" and "RGBinary.{c,h}". but its almost incomprehensible for us
        Could you email us the algorithm in detail so that we can try coding it on our own? We're confident about coding since we have a fully functional GPU parallelized Smith-Waterman code, written by us

        sorry for the trouble.. thank you for ur time

        Comment

        • nilshomer
          Nils Homer
          • Nov 2008
          • 1283

          #5
          Originally posted by nikhil.stephen View Post
          @nilshomer
          we are 4th year students doing our final year project and we tried understanding the code given in "RGIndex.{c,h}" and "RGBinary.{c,h}". but its almost incomprehensible for us
          Could you email us the algorithm in detail so that we can try coding it on our own? We're confident about coding since we have a fully functional GPU parallelized Smith-Waterman code, written by us

          sorry for the trouble.. thank you for ur time
          This will be beyond my ability to help,

          Nils

          Comment

          • god_particle
            Junior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 3

            #6
            Originally posted by nikhil.stephen View Post
            Dear Sir,

            We are Computer Engineering Students. We have read the BFAST paper


            We are trying to implement it using GPUs.(CUDA) But we are facing some trouble with the indexing bit.
            Could you explain or provide sources for more information on how BFAST creates a reference genome and how indexing is done?
            Hi, Interesting work. I am working in a R&D lab on various High Performance Computing applications. Would like to see if we can collaborate on this effort. Please contact me if you are interested ([email protected]).

            Comment

            • nilshomer
              Nils Homer
              • Nov 2008
              • 1283

              #7
              Why not try to make the core parts vectorized (i.e the Smith Waterman)? The extra money spent on GPUs could be used to buy multi-core processors (not to mention saving rack space). The vectorized implementation would have a greater impact on users than GPUs. I think SHRiMP has vectorized code embedded. This is on my wishlist for BFAST ahead of GPU support.

              My 2 cents.

              Comment

              • god_particle
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2011
                • 3

                #8
                Originally posted by nilshomer View Post
                Why not try to make the core parts vectorized (i.e the Smith Waterman)? The extra money spent on GPUs could be used to buy multi-core processors (not to mention saving rack space). The vectorized implementation would have a greater impact on users than GPUs. I think SHRiMP has vectorized code embedded. This is on my wishlist for BFAST ahead of GPU support.

                My 2 cents.
                Makes sense. I am looking at using OpenCL rather than CUDA, hence still allowing it to take the path you have mentioned.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  Yesterday, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                8 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                31 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                29 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...