Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SMO
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 6

    Agilent human exon coverage plots

    My lab has been using the Agilent 50Mb SureSelect Human All Exon kit for many months now. Though the data is acceptable, we can’t help but wonder why our coverage plots look so different from Agilent coverage plots. (see attachment) Do other users produce data that results in coverage plots similar to those advertised by Agilent? If so, do you have any suggestions as to why we are seeing this disparity? Or, are our results the accepted norm?
    Attached Files
    Last edited by SMO; 05-02-2011, 11:33 AM.
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    How are you sequencing it? GAIIX, HiSeq, SOLdD etc? Barcoded? If so, how many exomes per lane?

    Comment

    • SMO
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 6

      #3
      These were ran on HiSeq 2000, and were not indexed.

      Comment

      • Jon_Keats
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 279

        #4
        What are you seeing for percent on target?

        Comment

        • SMO
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2011
          • 6

          #5
          on target is around 72-80%.
          Last edited by SMO; 05-03-2011, 05:38 AM.

          Comment

          • SMO
            Junior Member
            • Apr 2011
            • 6

            #6
            Also, we are getting an average of 80 million reads for a PE 2x101.

            Comment

            • Michael.James.Clark
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2009
              • 207

              #7
              Your curves are consistent with what I see when running Agilent 50M SureSelect with paired 100bp reads.

              Not sure what this "Agilent's data" curve you're showing is, but it may be due to any number of things--library prep, Agilent likely used paired 76bp reads (which they recommend), et cetera.
              Mendelian Disorder: A blogshare of random useful information for general public consumption. [Blog]
              Breakway: A Program to Identify Structural Variations in Genomic Data [Website] [Forum Post]
              Projects: U87MG whole genome sequence [Website] [Paper]

              Comment

              • SMO
                Junior Member
                • Apr 2011
                • 6

                #8
                Thanks for the input.
                Do you see similar coverage plots for Agilent mouse?
                We have noticed that the curves for mouse differ greatly from human, using the same protocol, reagents and technicians. See attachment.
                Attached Files

                Comment

                • Michael.James.Clark
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 207

                  #9
                  I don't understand the Y-axis here. What are you calling "the exome"?

                  Haven't done Mouse myself. But again, I would not fret over this.

                  The Sureselect 50M performance is still high over its targets regardless.
                  Mendelian Disorder: A blogshare of random useful information for general public consumption. [Blog]
                  Breakway: A Program to Identify Structural Variations in Genomic Data [Website] [Forum Post]
                  Projects: U87MG whole genome sequence [Website] [Paper]

                  Comment

                  • meher
                    Member
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 54

                    #10
                    Script

                    Originally posted by SMO View Post
                    My lab has been using the Agilent 50Mb SureSelect Human All Exon kit for many months now. Though the data is acceptable, we can’t help but wonder why our coverage plots look so different from Agilent coverage plots. (see attachment) Do other users produce data that results in coverage plots similar to those advertised by Agilent? If so, do you have any suggestions as to why we are seeing this disparity? Or, are our results the accepted norm?
                    Hi,

                    could you provide the script, with which you have generated the plot shown in "human coverage plot.pdf" ?

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:09 AM
                    0 responses
                    10 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                    0 responses
                    17 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
                    0 responses
                    26 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
                    0 responses
                    21 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Working...