Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brachysclereid
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 32

    #1

    3.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7 versus 3.1GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5

    Hi,
    I am looking at buying some iMAC workstations for our lab. We can access larger linux computing resources for big jobs, but this for basic stuff such as alignments & RNAseq (we work with bacterial genomes & the occasional RNAseq experiment on small plant genomes - arabidopsis). We are getting a couple of the new apple quad core machines with 16GB RAM. Would it be worth the $180 to get the 3.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7 instead of the 3.1GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5?

    I am a little worried that I might have more trouble with the 3.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7 because of the hyperthreading. Does anyone know if this technology would cause any difficulties with openmpi or integration with any other next gen software?
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    I run on a hyper-threaded dual-hex-core, and it can run 24-threads on a well-programmed multi-threaded program. If you can get those specs, go for it.

    Comment

    • brachysclereid
      Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 32

      #3
      Thanks Nils. I went with the 3.4GHz i7. Sounds sweet.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      38 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      44 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...