Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • moinul
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 10

    Newbler de novo assembly

    Hi all!
    I'm very new to de novo assembly. I tried to assemble 454 cDNA shotgun reads using Newbler 2.5.3. By adding reads to a new project, I tried to run the project with default parameters, but got the following error at the end-

    "Error: An internal error has occurred in the computation.
    Assertion: pos >= 1 && pos <= getLength()
    Location: 'int Sequence::getCafieScore(int)' [Sequence.cpp:259]
    Please report this error to your customer support representative."

    Can anyone help me how to resolve this? And also let me know what to do exactly if want to assemble reads at once (i.e. one step assembly)?

    Moinul
  • RCJK
    Senior Member
    • May 2009
    • 156

    #2
    Hi moinul,

    I had the same error a week or two ago(below) and have been trying to get an answer from Roche.
    In the generating output phase:

    Call Stack:
    8: safeAssert(char const*, char const*, unsigned int, char const*)
    7: Sequence::getCafieScore(int)
    6: Alignment::setSnpMode(int)
    5: Alignment::set(ChordMatrix*, std::vector<ChordRegion, std::allocator<ChordRegion> > const&, bool, int)
    4: OutputPhase::setupAlignmentObject(ScaffoldIterJob*)
    3: OutputPhaseWorkerThread::run()
    2: Thread::_dispatch(void*)
    1: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 [0x324ff0683c]

    Error: An internal error has occurred in the computation.
    Assertion: pos >= 1 && pos <= getLength()
    Location: 'int Sequence::getCafieScore(int)' [Sequence.cpp:259]
    Please report this error to your customer support representative.


    The best thought they've had so far is that perhaps there is too much depth in a part of the assembly and it is causing problems w/ Newbler. I can assemble the first region fine and it goes rather quickly, but when I try adding the file for the other half of the plate, it goes for days and days and eventually stops responding.

    Anybody have any thoughts? Any idea how to look for areas of high coverage (what's too high?) and how to exclude some of those reads from and assembly to see if it'll finish. Would running newbler on something more powerful (more cpus/ram) than the titanium cluster help?

    Comment

    • moinul
      Member
      • May 2011
      • 10

      #3
      thanks RCJK..............

      Comment

      • mccallumj
        Junior Member
        • May 2009
        • 3

        #4
        Newbler fail reproduced!

        Im having the same issues with re-assembling a plate of Titanium cDNA reads.
        Will inspect for depth issues, contact my customer support representative and maybe look at another assembler to be on the safe side!

        Regards
        John

        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

        Call Stack:
        8: safeAssert(char const*, char const*, unsigned int, char const*)
        7: Sequence::getCafieScore(int)
        6: Alignment::setSnpMode(int)
        5: Alignment::set(ChordMatrix*, std::vector<ChordRegion, std::allocator<ChordRegion> > const&, bool, int)
        4: OutputPhase::setupAlignmentObject(ScaffoldIterJob*)
        3: OutputPhaseWorkerThread::run()
        2: Thread::_dispatch(void*)
        1: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 [0x3b3f60673d]

        Error: An internal error has occurred in the computation.
        Assertion: pos >= 1 && pos <= getLength()
        Location: 'int Sequence::getCafieScore(int)' [Sequence.cpp:259]

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          Yesterday, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...