Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fpruzius
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 4

    #1

    Bfast Fatal Error during indexing

    Hi,

    I am trying to index a fastafile with the human genome (build GRCh37, only chromosomes + MT) using bfast. In color space.
    I am using version 0.6.4f. As a guildeline I use secion 8.1.2 from the manual.

    Converting the reads to fastq and making both the color space and letter space brg files work without any trouble.

    However when I want to make the indexes the program grinds to a halt.

    The command I use:

    Code:
    bfast index -f human.fasta -m 1111111111111111111111 -w 14 -i 1 -A 1 -T /tmp/
    So human.fasta is my reference genome. and the files human.fasta.cs.brg and human.fasta.nt.brg have been generated.

    The output:

    Code:
    ************************************************************
    Checking input parameters supplied by the user ...
    Validating fastaFileName human.fasta.
    Validating tmpDir path /tmp/.
    Input arguments look good!
    ************************************************************
    ************************************************************
    Printing Program Parameters:
    programMode:                            [ExecuteProgram]
    fastaFileName:                          human.fasta
    space:                                  [Color Space]
    mask:                                   1111111111111111111111
    depth:                                  0
    hashWidth:                              14
    indexNumber:                            1
    repeatMasker:                           [Not Using]
    startContig:                            0
    startPos:                               0
    endContig:                              2147483647
    endPos:                                 2147483647
    exonsFileName:                          [Not Using]
    numThreads:                             4
    tmpDir:                                 /tmp/
    timing:                                 [Not Using]
    ************************************************************
    ************************************************************
    Reading in reference genome from human.fasta.cs.brg.
    In total read 25 contigs for a total of 3095693983 bases
    ************************************************************
    Creating the index...
    ************************************************************
    Warning: startContig was less than zero.
    Defaulting to contig=1 and position=1.
    ************************************************************
    ************************************************************
    Warning: endContig was greater than the number of contigs in the reference genome.
    Defaulting to reference genome's end contig=25 and position=16571.
    ************************************************************
    Currently on [contig,pos]:
    [------25,------16571]
    Sorting by thread...                                                                                                                                        
    100.000 percent complete************************************************************
    In function "RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8": Fatal Error[ReadFileError]. Message: Could not read in tmp lower.
    The file stream error was:: Bad file descriptor
     ***** Exiting due to errors *****
    ************************************************************
    So it works, but as soon when the index should be written to disk it fails. THis happens after around 24 hours.

    I have tried to check if something is wrong with the harddisk, an no fsck dont gives any problems. And I can create a large file with other programs.

    The output file human.fasta.cs.1.1.bif is generated, however has zero length.
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    In "configure.ac" in the source directory, try changing the following line
    Code:
    extended_CFLAGS="";# "-m64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64";
    to
    Code:
    extended_CFLAGS="-m64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64";
    You then probably need to re-run "bfast fasta2brg".

    Comment

    • fpruzius
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 4

      #3
      Thanks for the reply.
      I changed the configuration file and recompiled the source.

      Unoftunately it did not help. still getting the following error:

      Code:
      Sorting...                                                                                                                                              100.000 percent complete************************************************************
      In function "RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8": Fatal Error[ReadFileError]. Message: Could not read in tmp lower.
      The file stream error was:: Bad file descriptor
       ***** Exiting due to errors *****
      ************************************************************

      Comment

      • nilshomer
        Nils Homer
        • Nov 2008
        • 1283

        #4
        Originally posted by fpruzius View Post
        Thanks for the reply.
        I changed the configuration file and recompiled the source.

        Unoftunately it did not help. still getting the following error:

        Code:
        Sorting...                                                                                                                                              100.000 percent complete************************************************************
        In function "RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8": Fatal Error[ReadFileError]. Message: Could not read in tmp lower.
        The file stream error was:: Bad file descriptor
         ***** Exiting due to errors *****
        ************************************************************
        I can't replicate your error, so unfortunately I cannot debug. Could you try it on a different computer and see if you can replicate?

        Comment

        • brentp
          Member
          • Apr 2010
          • 72

          #5
          Also see this thread:

          Comment

          • cdry7ue
            Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 20

            #6
            Nils,
            I am getting the exact same error


            In function "RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8": Fatal Error[ReadFileError]. Message: Could not read in tmp lower.
            The file stream error was:: Bad file descriptor
            ***** Exiting due to errors *****
            ************************************************************

            [1]+ Exit 1 bfast index -m 111111111111111111111111 -w 14 -n 32 -i 1 -f hg19.fa

            Were you guys ever able to find out what the deal was with this one? I also have a 64 bit system with 2Tb disk space.
            -Ashish

            Comment

            • nilshomer
              Nils Homer
              • Nov 2008
              • 1283

              #7
              I would LOVE to get a test case so that I can reproduce. Until then, I have to keep guessing.

              Could you try to apply this change?
              Code:
              diff --git a/bfast/RGIndex.c b/bfast/RGIndex.c
              index 3e8f57a..2953596 100644
              --- a/bfast/RGIndex.c
              +++ b/bfast/RGIndex.c
              @@ -1356,8 +1356,15 @@ void RGIndexMergeHelperFromDiskContig_8(RGIndex *index,
                      }
               
                      /* Move to beginning of the files */
              +        /*
                      fseek(tmpLowerFP, 0 , SEEK_SET);
                      fseek(tmpUpperFP, 0 , SEEK_SET);
              +        */
              +        fclose(tmpLowerFP);
              +        tmpLowerFP = fopen(tmpLowerFileName, "wb+");
              +        assert(NULL != tmpLowerFP);
              +        tmpUpperFP = fopen(tmpUpperFileName, "wb+");
              +        assert(NULL != tmpUpperFP);

              Comment

              • Magnus
                Junior Member
                • Nov 2009
                • 5

                #8
                +1, same error for me as well.

                Tested both extended_CFLAGS="-m64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" and the patch without any success .

                What could I do to help you find a solution Nils?

                Comment

                • nilshomer
                  Nils Homer
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 1283

                  #9
                  Do you have a test case? Give me a FASTA and detail your environment (OS, machine, bfast version).

                  Nils

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                    by SEQadmin2



                    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                    ...
                    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                    by SEQadmin2


                    Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                    The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                    ...
                    07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                    by SEQadmin2



                    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                    ...
                    07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
                  0 responses
                  19 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
                  0 responses
                  16 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
                  0 responses
                  16 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
                  0 responses
                  26 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...