Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ZAAB
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 18

    #1

    150nt insert size, generating libraries, question!

    Hi All:
    I'm preparing libraries for the HiSeq...
    We're generating a library of variants, and the whole construct is 143nt long...with 30 nt in the middle that are variable (lots of variants!).

    Trying to adapt the TruSeq protocols to my application, I've already had to resort to using Qiagen Minelute columns instead of AmpPure (my size is below the threshold (all in the wash)).

    I am planning on producing 1ug of DNA (via PCR, unfortunately) to then do end-repair, phosphorylation, ligation, etc...

    Am I on the right track here...or should I assume loss after shearing? By 'loss', I mean that not all gDNA is at the correct size after shearing, but I know my PCR'd DNA is All the right size...or do I just go forward with 1ug of PCR'd DNA?

    Also, since my final size is going to be smaller than suggested, should I alter amplification/extension conditions in the cluster station? I'm not running the machine, so what should I tell the tech?

    Thanks!
  • shurjo
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 132

    #2
    We're generating a library of variants, and the whole construct is 143nt long...with 30 nt in the middle that are variable (lots of variants!).
    If all your contructs are the same size, why do you need to shear? In fact, if you used Taq for the PCR, you can go straight to adapter ligation afterwards.

    Just my two cents.

    Comment

    • ZAAB
      Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 18

      #3
      Exactly! Yes, I am using Taq, and Yes, I do not need to shear...
      Just interested in the amount of DNA from a 1ug shearing 'reaction'..what amount is of the correct size...80%? I'll have 100%, so I don't want to overload the downstream analysis...

      Thanks for confirming why I don't need to do endrepair, etc.

      Z

      Comment

      • HESmith
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 512

        #4
        All of the input DNA is present through the gel extraction step, so all of the reaction conditions are calculated for that amount. It's immaterial what fraction is of the desired size until the PCR amplification, and at that point the protocol has recommended guidelines based on the amount of fragment.

        Comment

        • ZAAB
          Member
          • Apr 2011
          • 18

          #5
          I guess I was worried about overloading the ligation reaction with insert. I am never convinced that all DNA is carried forward when there is a wash/Ampure step.
          Thanks for all replies.

          I ended up performing the A-tailing rxn again, even though its TAQ-amplified, as I know A's do 'fall off' from experience. And, that volume and enzyme mix is present in the ligation rxn, with no cleanup involved between those steps.

          THanks!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
          0 responses
          19 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...