Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slny
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 54

    PCR duplicates questions

    Hi,

    I'm still confused about PCR duplicates removal and have some questions about it.

    1. What is PCR duplicates? Can I say that all reads mapped to the same genome location are PCR duplicates?

    2. Is PCR duplicates removal necessary for mRNA Seq and Genome DNA Seq?

    Thanks a lot!
    Slny
  • Heisman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 534

    #2
    PCR duplicates are sequences of DNA that arise from the same parent molecule throughout the course of many PCR cycles. Thus, after sequencing one of them, you do not learn any new biological information from sequencing more of them as you are just repetitively obtaining the sequence of the same parent molecule.

    If two reads map to the exact same location and have the same sequence, that is evidence they are PCR duplicates. It's also possible that this will occur by random chance, especially if you obtain high coverage. If you use paired end reads, then it's easier to pick out duplicates as both reads have to start at the same location.

    You should definitely remove PCR duplicates as they do not yield more information. In fact, they will artificially give you more information, possibly misrepresenting the actual sample.

    Comment

    • slny
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 54

      #3
      For mRNA Seq, if we remove the PCR duplicates, which actually occurred by random chance, then we will get wrong read counts. Is removal of PCR duplicates also recommended in mRNA Seq?

      Comment

      • JohnK
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 106

        #4
        Originally posted by slny View Post
        For mRNA Seq, if we remove the PCR duplicates, which actually occurred by random chance, then we will get wrong read counts. Is removal of PCR duplicates also recommended in mRNA Seq?
        Essentially, you're removing them because you can't disambiguate whether the read came from a unique bead source versus PCR. IMO, I removed PCR dups based on start and stop alone, because PCR has an inherent error rate. As before, you can't tell whether the base-differences (mm) came from independent events, or PCR-error.

        Comment

        • JohnK@Genome_Quest
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2011
          • 7

          #5
          Originally posted by slny View Post
          For mRNA Seq, if we remove the PCR duplicates, which actually occurred by random chance, then we will get wrong read counts. Is removal of PCR duplicates also recommended in mRNA Seq?
          Also, I removed PCR duplicates for all applications- even RNA-Seq. Clearly, if you're trying to estimate transcript abundance, or estimate splicing-efficiency then PCR duplicates will have some sort of effect on your results. Now I'm not saying it'll be terrible, but subtle- yes. This of course is a matter of opinion, and I've seen people put up 'ok' arguments both ways. I'd say you'd have to get down into the finer details of your experiment as well as see how much PCR was done.

          Comment

          • kopi-o
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 319

            #6
            If you have paired-end data for RNA-seq, PCR duplicates should be removed. There is a very low probability to get identically mapping paired-end reads and the bias from leaving PCR duplicates will almost certainly be worse than the removal of a few genuine fragments.

            Comment

            • slny
              Member
              • Mar 2011
              • 54

              #7
              Does removal of PCR duplicates mean that all the reads are removed or only one read is kept?

              If only one read is kept, then it won't influence the de novo assembling result no matter removing PCR duplicates or not. If all the reads are removed, then bias is created.

              Comment

              • JohnK@Genome_Quest
                Junior Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 7

                #8
                One read is kept.

                Comment

                • slny
                  Member
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 54

                  #9
                  Got it. Thanks a lot for all the helps.

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                    by SEQadmin2


                    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.

                    Probing...
                    Today, 11:10 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                    by SEQadmin2



                    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                    Yesterday, 05:17 AM
                  • GATTACAT
                    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by GATTACAT
                    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
                  0 responses
                  7 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
                  0 responses
                  6 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                  0 responses
                  9 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                  0 responses
                  31 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...