Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ECO
    --Site Admin--
    • Oct 2007
    • 1360

    Complete Genomics Forum and cleaner subforum naming

    Based on a couple requests, I've opened a Complete Genomics forum.

    In addition, I cleaned up the sequencing company forum names as they were very long and ugly. =]

    More suggestions welcome!
  • scordes
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 9

    #2
    Hi

    Would it be possible to include Complete Genomics as an option in the list of "instruments" one selects when creating a user account?

    While we don't sell our machines, there are definitely users of our technology who frequent this site.

    thanks

    Shaun
    Shaun Cordes, PhD | Customer Support Scientist | Complete Genomics, Inc.
    Toll-free: (855) 267-5358 | Direct: (650) 943-2651
    [email protected]

    Comment

    • ECO
      --Site Admin--
      • Oct 2007
      • 1360

      #3
      Hi Shaun,

      Done!

      Comment

      • scordes
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 9

        #4
        Thank you!
        Shaun Cordes, PhD | Customer Support Scientist | Complete Genomics, Inc.
        Toll-free: (855) 267-5358 | Direct: (650) 943-2651
        [email protected]

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...