Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vebaev
    Senior Res.
    • Oct 2008
    • 112

    plant annotation pipeline for assembled RNAseq?

    Dear all,
    since I'm not deeply into protein-coding genes I wanted to ask If I have already huge number of assembled RNA sequences (EST) from illumina is there a piplines for automatic annotation of sequences based on homology (for example to Arabidopsis proteins with blastX) or I should write my oun script?


    Thanks

    PS
    the new seqs from illumina are plant with non-sequenced genome
    ------------
    SMART - bioinfo.uni-plovdiv.bg
  • westerman
    Rick Westerman
    • Jun 2008
    • 1104

    #2
    blast2go is one solution.

    Comment

    • vebaev
      Senior Res.
      • Oct 2008
      • 112

      #3
      Thanks it looks very interesting!
      ------------
      SMART - bioinfo.uni-plovdiv.bg

      Comment

      • sarwar
        Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 14

        #4
        Hey vebaev ! Now a days i am also in the same situation where i have analyse and annotate the assembled RNA sequences. So what strategies you used that with your case. Can you please give the detail or refer any paper or pipeline which is standard in scientific community to annotae characterise transcriptome assembly. OF course mine organism is non model plant organism.

        Thanks in advance

        Comment

        • vebaev
          Senior Res.
          • Oct 2008
          • 112

          #5
          Hi,
          I used blast2go it is quite cute program...
          ------------
          SMART - bioinfo.uni-plovdiv.bg

          Comment

          • usad
            Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 53

            #6
            Plant classification pipeline

            Hi,

            You might want to try our Mercator Plant classification pipeline. It will also create some kind of annotation.

            http://mapman.gabipd.org/web/guest/mercator.


            Cheers,
            bj

            Comment

            • blindtiger454
              Member
              • Oct 2010
              • 30

              #7
              I suggest you use the NCBI protein database first. We did plant transcriptome assembly and a small percent (~5%) of our assembled and annotated transcripts were contaminants, such as bacterial, viral, and fungal sequences. Probably metagenomic leftovers, but the only way to catch them is to use the NCBI NR database, and look at the taxonomy of each best blast hit. If you use a plant database only, some of the contaminant sequences will match a plant protein will some similarity, and will be annotated as such. Then when RNA-Seq analysis is performed, I've seen instances where these contaminant sequences will show significant differential expression if they are not removed from your dataset.

              Comment

              • sarwar
                Member
                • Apr 2010
                • 14

                #8
                But again i would like to advice about parameter of similarity , we generally take E-value <1e-10 and alignment length 100 and identity more than 80% . If you have chosen same or similar and then giving 5% contaminants , we have to be careful.

                Comment

                • shengandy
                  Junior Member
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 3

                  #9
                  I am in similar situation. Working with non-model species with RNA-seq results. I am using blast2go for annotation. It is time-consuming considering about the data of RNA-seq. Is there any alternative? Thanks, SH

                  Comment

                  • usad
                    Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 53

                    #10
                    Dear shengandy

                    If you really were only interested in speed you could use simple blast (with a sprinkle of reciprocal best blast) versus a related (and well annotated) species . I would not really recommend it though, usually spending more time to get something decent always pays of.

                    And usually all the annotation pipelines don't take that long if you have some decent infrastructure. (If not maybe you get in touch with some local groups?)

                    Cheers,
                    Bj

                    Comment

                    • shengandy
                      Junior Member
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 3

                      #11
                      Dear Usad,

                      Thanks for your response. I do care about the quality. That is why I did not choose to blast against certain genome. I have about 2 million sequences from de novo assembly. It will take about 20 days if everything goes well and it won't use up the memory. Is this the general situation for annotation? Thanks -SH

                      Comment

                      • Tanushree
                        Junior Member
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 9

                        #12
                        hello!!
                        i am trying to install maker software but it has large number of dependencies , can any one help me with that. or suggest any other tools which can identify transposons , SSRs and other gene features.

                        Comment

                        • DZhang
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 177

                          #13
                          Hi,

                          I use both blast2go and nr blastx to annotate RNA seq data. One thing I would like to share is that blastx as standalone or via blast2go takes a huge amount of time if you use NCBI/EBI due to load restriction. So if you need quick results, you definitely seek other resources for blast/interproscan. Also install the GO database locally can dramatically improve the speed, too.

                          Best regards,
                          Douglas

                          Comment

                          • kashif_nawaz
                            Junior Member
                            • Jun 2014
                            • 7

                            #14
                            Hi..
                            I have a list of genes from cufflinks from one organism (Oryza sativa indica). All gene are important to be functionally categorize. I want to do GO and other same stuff from blast2go. How can I do it? Or can I use any other fast technique other than blast2go? Please suggest me

                            Comment

                            • sarwar
                              Member
                              • Apr 2010
                              • 14

                              #15
                              your question is not clear to me. if you want to do with blast2go, you please install and give your genes as input and then find out go terms, using first blast tab and then map and annotaion . However, there is another quick way to map to go terms if your genes are mapped to uniprot gene id. if you have gene id from uniprot or simply map to uniprot genes and get id. go to retrieve tab of uniprot , upload the id and you will get all go terms as well as go slim of all the genes.

                              Comment

                              Latest Articles

                              Collapse

                              • GATTACAT
                                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                                by GATTACAT
                                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                              • SEQadmin2
                                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                                by SEQadmin2


                                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                              ad_right_rmr

                              Collapse

                              News

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
                              0 responses
                              6 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                              0 responses
                              27 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                              0 responses
                              25 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                              0 responses
                              25 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Working...