Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    First gen forum?

    So I know that "the next generation sequencing community" excludes first gen, "Sanger" sequencing discussions.

    But I've just replied to first gen question in the solid forum, and I am wondering why first gen stuff is proscribed here. If it had its own forum, it seems like it would be very useful.

    Are there other good venues for this type of content that I'm unaware of? The old bionet.autosequencing newsgroup is lamentably effectively dead due to the diminishing pool of NNTP servers, etc. The ABRF discussion forum is still there, but I find it painful to use. All methods are jumbled together into a single pile. Also its email list back-end is extremely irritating. I set my ABRF account not to email me anything. But every post I do invariably results in a bunch of "out of office" messages being routed to me.

    So ECO, why not here?

    --
    Phillip
  • ECO
    --Site Admin--
    • Oct 2007
    • 1360

    #2
    I can't think of a reason why not, especially since we'll be needing a third-gen section soon. Will try to get it up this weekend.

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      Hi ECO,
      Any chance of getting that Sanger Seq forum added?

      I think of the old radioactive gel methodology (before automated sequencers) as "zero gen". So "first gen" is still "next" to "zero gen", eh?

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      • ECO
        --Site Admin--
        • Oct 2007
        • 1360

        #4
        Ugh, I totally dropped that ball didn't I. Look for it in a moment. =]

        Comment

        • ECO
          --Site Admin--
          • Oct 2007
          • 1360

          #5
          "Capillary" ?

          "Sanger" ?

          "Automated" ?

          "Mono-template" ?

          "Non-parallel" ?

          Comment

          • ECO
            --Site Admin--
            • Oct 2007
            • 1360

            #6
            Done: http://seqanswers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=42

            Naming open for modification...time to fill it up with posts now.

            In the future if you don't see something like this happen in a day or two, feel free to drop me an email at admin@. It's easy for me to miss posts like these given how many roll through in a given day.

            Comment

            • pmiguel
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 2328

              #7
              "Sanger" is probably most used terminology now. (Also, would keep the Maxam-Gilbert riff-raff out of the forum...)

              --
              Phillip

              Comment

              • KamMothe
                Junior Member
                • Jul 2019
                • 5

                #8
                First gen forum

                Ive seen this on other forums, make a forum called the reviews section. That way they can review the board or handle or snow sled or whatever.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                  ...
                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                12 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                48 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                0 responses
                107 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                0 responses
                125 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...