Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #1

    First gen forum?

    So I know that "the next generation sequencing community" excludes first gen, "Sanger" sequencing discussions.

    But I've just replied to first gen question in the solid forum, and I am wondering why first gen stuff is proscribed here. If it had its own forum, it seems like it would be very useful.

    Are there other good venues for this type of content that I'm unaware of? The old bionet.autosequencing newsgroup is lamentably effectively dead due to the diminishing pool of NNTP servers, etc. The ABRF discussion forum is still there, but I find it painful to use. All methods are jumbled together into a single pile. Also its email list back-end is extremely irritating. I set my ABRF account not to email me anything. But every post I do invariably results in a bunch of "out of office" messages being routed to me.

    So ECO, why not here?

    --
    Phillip
  • ECO
    --Site Admin--
    • Oct 2007
    • 1360

    #2
    I can't think of a reason why not, especially since we'll be needing a third-gen section soon. Will try to get it up this weekend.

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      Hi ECO,
      Any chance of getting that Sanger Seq forum added?

      I think of the old radioactive gel methodology (before automated sequencers) as "zero gen". So "first gen" is still "next" to "zero gen", eh?

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      • ECO
        --Site Admin--
        • Oct 2007
        • 1360

        #4
        Ugh, I totally dropped that ball didn't I. Look for it in a moment. =]

        Comment

        • ECO
          --Site Admin--
          • Oct 2007
          • 1360

          #5
          "Capillary" ?

          "Sanger" ?

          "Automated" ?

          "Mono-template" ?

          "Non-parallel" ?

          Comment

          • ECO
            --Site Admin--
            • Oct 2007
            • 1360

            #6
            Done: http://seqanswers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=42

            Naming open for modification...time to fill it up with posts now.

            In the future if you don't see something like this happen in a day or two, feel free to drop me an email at admin@. It's easy for me to miss posts like these given how many roll through in a given day.

            Comment

            • pmiguel
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 2328

              #7
              "Sanger" is probably most used terminology now. (Also, would keep the Maxam-Gilbert riff-raff out of the forum...)

              --
              Phillip

              Comment

              • KamMothe
                Junior Member
                • Jul 2019
                • 5

                #8
                First gen forum

                Ive seen this on other forums, make a forum called the reviews section. That way they can review the board or handle or snow sled or whatever.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                  by SEQadmin2



                  CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                  Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                  ...
                  07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                  The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                  ...
                  07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 12:22 PM
                0 responses
                12 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
                0 responses
                13 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
                0 responses
                30 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
                0 responses
                48 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...